Dubstepforum.com

concord dawn.

epoch wrote:

1 word: spor

Really?

yes really

BrokenNo!ze wrote:You're probably the type of person who spends hours on end looking for different VST's believing that it'll improve your sound

I've been known to do this..........

Although admittedly, it was more to find programs with lots of features that are easy to use.

The more power you've got available, coupled with speedy work flow should improve the sound of anyone who knows what their doing!

how long till we get 8.5?

DREADNORT wrote:ask benga and skream the same question

i use it for everything i make and i wouldnt dream of using anything else

dont forget SPOR!

ridiculous thread. fl studio is epic

nowaysj wrote:Fruity doesn't handle audio well. Thats just a matter of fact, admitted by fruity's developers. Its audio handling has come a long way, though, and is enough prolly for a lot of peeps, and prolly almost everyone making electronic music.

But I've been getting more into working with audio for beats, and fruity just isn't good for that. Been using fruity for very close to 10 years, so don't trip, love it.

Moved from logic to fruity.

you mean like handling .wav files?

if that's the case, i have to agree.

although it would be hard to disagree if they admit it themselves lol

The beta ends in june - so maybe a late june / july release?

edison is horse shit

i wish they hadn't got rid of the old wav editor

anyone who thinks FL cant manipulate audio well should check out http://www.myspace.com/metbiddler
all his remixes are done in FL only

3za wrote:

Lojik wrote:I make all my beats in Fl Studio. It definately isn't beginner crap.

big up

fuck the haters

I have to say i agree with these two gentlemen.

i use FL for my beatz.

P.S, shite thread.

I think this is a good thread...

All of you people who are FL only have probably never recorded audio on it.

FL is good if you want to be an underground producer forever, but eventually if you want to start getting vocalists, or other musicians into your studio you will need to use another DAW.

Benga uses FL for the step sequencer according to future music... He obviously hadn't learnt how to use Ultra Beats at the time, which is just as simple to use.

Personally, I think all the producers you have named in this thread who used FL have probably changed DAW by now.

WiREZ wrote:I think this is a good thread...

All of you people who are FL only have probably never recorded audio on it.

FL is good if you want to be an underground producer forever, but eventually if you want to start getting vocalists, or other musicians into your studio you will need to use another DAW.

Benga uses FL for the step sequencer according to future music... He obviously hadn't learnt how to use Ultra Beats at the time, which is just as simple to use.

Personally, I think all the producers you have named in this thread who used FL have probably changed DAW by now.

if we would go back a few versions of FL i would agree whit you, but now when we got Edison i think this DAW is starting to become pretty much complete.

there might still be some editing functions i miss in edison, but nothing theres no easy workarounds for.

and i agree whit nowaysj, protools and cubase and such are more powerfull in the audio compartment, but they lack in other things instead, sequenzing for example.

Oblivious wrote:

WiREZ wrote:I think this is a good thread...

All of you people who are FL only have probably never recorded audio on it.

FL is good if you want to be an underground producer forever, but eventually if you want to start getting vocalists, or other musicians into your studio you will need to use another DAW.

Benga uses FL for the step sequencer according to future music... He obviously hadn't learnt how to use Ultra Beats at the time, which is just as simple to use.

Personally, I think all the producers you have named in this thread who used FL have probably changed DAW by now.

if we would go back a few versions of FL i would agree whit you, but now when we got Edison i think this DAW is starting to become pretty much complete.

there might still be some editing functions i miss in edison, but nothing theres no easy workarounds for.

and i agree whit nowaysj, protools and cubase and such are more powerfull in the audio compartment, but they lack in other things instead, sequenzing for example.

sequencing in cubase is easy as hell

Deadly Habit wrote: sequencing in cubase is easy as hell

havnt said anything contrary to that.
but last time i was checking out cubase i never saw any of the sequenzing tools we got in FL, like the strum/flam tools for example

i've been using fl studio for like 6 years.

i haven't even figured out how to use fl studio 5 fully, much less fl 8.

i dunno, maybe i'm just really dumb, but it seems like it has way more features than i even know what to do with.