signals wrote:it will drive you mad listening to a whole set
A whole set of one sound would do that to you anyway....
if its a 2 hr+ set the same bpm and same genre
if it's something fluid and deep, like youngster, I can take a few hours. But I don't think I can stand a juke, trap or a commercial house set for more than an hour.
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:43 am
by ultraspatial
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:46 am
by cryptical
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:52 am
by Sexual_Chocolate
Hircine wrote:
signals wrote:
Nevalo wrote:
signals wrote:it will drive you mad listening to a whole set
A whole set of one sound would do that to you anyway....
if its a 2 hr+ set the same bpm and same genre
if it's something fluid and deep, like youngster, I can take a few hours. But I don't think I can stand a juke, trap or a commercial house set for more than an hour.
even a youngsta set can get boring as fuck.
*edit - unless hes playing an old school set, just not a fan of the new stuff
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:09 am
by Maccaveli
Agreed. Youngsta somehow managed to bore me in a live set. The first half was spent thinking "when's he going to play Badman VIP?" and the second half "I wish he'd play Badman VIP again."
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:57 am
by leyenda
Nevalo wrote:
Hircine wrote:
signals wrote:
Nevalo wrote:
signals wrote:it will drive you mad listening to a whole set
A whole set of one sound would do that to you anyway....
if its a 2 hr+ set the same bpm and same genre
if it's something fluid and deep, like youngster, I can take a few hours. But I don't think I can stand a juke, trap or a commercial house set for more than an hour.
even a youngsta set can get boring as fuck.
*edit - unless hes playing an old school set, just not a fan of the new stuff
So the conclusion is the only narrow selection we want to listen to for 2+ hours is old Loefah and Skream
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:03 pm
by Sexual_Chocolate
when they're unreleased dubs from back in the day.... yes
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:41 pm
by Lye_Form
Maccaveli wrote:Agreed. Youngsta somehow managed to bore me in a live set. The first half was spent thinking "when's he going to play Badman VIP?" and the second half "I wish he'd play Badman VIP again."
'Dungeon' sets bore the fuck out of me now.
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:34 pm
by Forum
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:30 pm
by SCope13
Fuck off, good juke is one of the best things out there. Kidding yourself if you think there's only a few good tracks. Last part of Sully's Carrier disproves this. And really not comparable to trap at all imo.
idk how anyone can listen to youngsta for more than 30 minutes
if you think u hate juke djs listen to traxman b/c he a lot of times mixes in old soul/funk plates
(also he uses serato & actually mixes tunes unlike rashad/spinn who just bounce between tracks on cdjs)
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:34 pm
by Forum
I'd listen to jump up bro&bass just to drown out the sound of juke
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:36 pm
by dickman69
so many rolls
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:38 pm
by SCope13
southstar wrote:I'd listen to jump up bro&bass just to drown out the sound of juke
Re: Brostep III - ßroClub
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:40 pm
by Forum
Im not joking, i could probably endure hazard/clownstep for longer than a rashad mix