Dubstepforum.com

nobody wrote:

DJoe wrote:
i know youre joking.
but yeah if one person was violent then yeah assume theyre violent
if you had a 2 groups of dogs, one that had black fur
the other had white
a white dog bites you
do you assume all the white dogs are more likely to bite you than the black one
you probably would assume
but youd be wrong to.

If dogs with white fur were going around biting people a lot more than dogs with black fur it's perfectly normal to want to keep your distance, no?

etc

DJoe wrote:

nobody wrote:

DJoe wrote:
i know youre joking.
but yeah if one person was violent then yeah assume theyre violent
if you had a 2 groups of dogs, one that had black fur
the other had white
a white dog bites you
do you assume all the white dogs are more likely to bite you than the black one
you probably would assume
but youd be wrong to.

If dogs with white fur were going around biting people a lot more than dogs with black fur it's perfectly normal to want to keep your distance, no?

etc

maybe it is perfectly normal. but if the only difference between the dog is their fur colour then that would be pretty pointless as you wouldnt actually be at more of being bitten

The only difference between a black person and white person is their skin colour.
to assume that a black person is more dangerous is to assume that there is a difference between them and a white person other than skin colour.

To make that assumption you have to be basing it on racial ideology
ie there is such a thing as race. skin colour denotes what race you are. Races behave differently to each other.
this ideology has been proven wrong by anthropologists and biologists since the 70's

there maybe socially constructed differences between groups of people.
heavy handed policing against one group of people and not the other is just going to reinforce those socially constructed differences.

DJoe wrote:but if the only difference between the dog is their fur colour then that would be pretty pointless as you wouldnt actually be at more of being bitten

DJoe wrote:The only difference between a black person and white person is their skin colour.

DJoe wrote:To make that assumption you have to be basing it on racial ideology

DJoe wrote:this ideology has been proven wrong by anthropologists and biologists since the 70's

butter_man wrote:is it true they eat people though?
be honest

DrGatineau wrote:don't wanna stir things up but interested in what you guys think of this vid:

[+] Spoiler

nwj, what's your opinion of this guy? decent news source?

Audio recordings the Post-Dispatch obtained of police and EMS radio calls before Brown was shot include Wilson asking whether he was needed to help respond to what the dispatcher called "stealing in progress" from a convenience store. The recordings also capture Wilson requesting backup after hearing the description of the convenience store suspect and encountering Brown and a friend walking nearby, and the police response to Brown's shooting.

Frat Suspended for "Clemson Cripmas" Party in Wake of Ferguson Protests



While Clemson students protested non-indictments in Ferguson and Staten Island on campus this weekend, some frat bros decided to elevate the race discussion by dressing like gang members. Sigma Alpha Epsilon threw a "Clemson Cripmas" theme party Saturday night, which featured a lot of white kids sporting fake tear drop tattoos.

The photos of the event are about as bad as you'd imagine.











SAE's national headquarters quickly suspended the frat after bros posted photos of the event on Instagram and Twitter and other Clemson students protested the party on campus.



It's not clear if the Cripmas party was a direct response to Ferguson protesters on campus, but according to posts on Yik Yak, racial tensions at the university are high. Students (perhaps the same frat bros who think it's funny to dress up like gang members) have posted comments like "what are these tar babies doing on Bowman Field" and "go back to Africa!" in response to black student activism.

Student protesters told Clemson President Jim Clements on Sunday that he could not stay silent about racism on campus now, especially after Cripmas. One student explained,

Which Clemson are you going to side with? ...We're happy that you're as a first step...but there's a distinct sense that through the silence that the university has had, you're taking sides with another Clemson. A Clemson that wants to harken back to the days of (former racist Governor of South Carolina) Ben Tillman. The silence seems to support that. ... We still hear this kind of safe language.

Clements did release a statement to the university yesterday, but his language was pretty safe. He wrote:

At a time of year when our thoughts are turning to family, holidays and the start of a new year – all the things that unite us and bring us joy — it is discouraging that so many events and issues are causing division and hurt, and making many students feel unwanted at this great university. It hurts to read disrespectful and just plain mean comments in social media. Last night's "Cripmas" party, which the university did not sanction, raised more concerns about the campus climate. Clemson is better than this.

Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion about events in Ferguson, Staten Island and the protest rallies that those events have spawned. Great universities are built on the free expression and exploration of ideas. But the free expression of opinion must not cross the line and become harassment or intimidation, just as rallies and protest marches must not cross the line to lawlessness.

Oh well, nice attempt. University officials are still "investigating" the Cripmas party and have threatened to suspend frat bros who attended it.

soronery wrote:tar babies though


thats a new one

soronery wrote:

nowaysj wrote:

soronery wrote:

This is horrifying. Charges should be brought.

soronery wrote:whats racist pussy

does it tell black cock to go back the way it came

butter_man wrote:

nowaysj wrote:

soronery wrote:

This is horrifying. Charges should be brought.

what does her t shirt say
'yes, I am
racist pussy'

indeed. indeed!