Page 37 of 38
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:27 am
				by AxeD
				Oh yeah, well he's basically using a replacement effect as an additive one. So like ehbrums said, the original on the channel is
being masked by the distorted signal on the aux. I thought he actually heard the original going down when the aux send was turned up 

 
			 
			
					
				ll
				Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:15 pm
				by RmoniK
				All of these comments are dead wrong, this is what's really happening and it's been bugging the hell out of me ever since i started producing:
The thing is, tape mode reverses the phase. I've checked, it's true, it just turns the damn signal around. If you want to use it in parallel (as a send) properly, you're gonna have to reverse the phase again, with a thor for instance.
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:43 pm
				by ehbes
				Any proof to back that up?
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:14 pm
				by RmoniK
				Before tape distortion:
After tape distortion:

 
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:30 pm
				by Ledger
				I have never understood why those "Fade In" & "Fade Out" icons are there, because they've ALWAYS been greyed out for me. Never interfered with my workflow in any way, just don't understand why they're there if they're always greyed out.
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:36 pm
				by RmoniK
				sofarmusic wrote:I have never understood why those "Fade In" & "Fade Out" icons are there, because they've ALWAYS been greyed out for me. Never interfered with my workflow in any way, just don't understand why they're there if they're always greyed out.
They're just to make fades. click and drag on the waveform, you'll have selected a part of it, then you can select either fade in or fade out. 
I use it a lot to shape the tail of my drums.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:39 pm
				by AxeD
				Still, the original is being masked then. Nice one!
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 9:38 am
				by MoonUnit
				Anyone have favorite RV7000 patches for use on midrange basslines?  
 
I need a catalyst for inspiration, if you will.
Cheers
 
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 9:44 am
				by MoonUnit
				Hey I'm a little confused about the rate CV pot on the phaser.
I wanted to synch it to an external LFO and it sounds like the CV sent from the LFO triggers an increase in the on-board LFO's speed.
Is this correct?
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 1:55 pm
				by Samuel_L_Damnson
				my favorite mid bass patch for rv7000 uses the small est room reverb setting with the decay turned right down and the EQ set to roll off everthing below 500hz and a small  boost at like 1k-2khz. Oh and like 30ms predelay. It makes things sound well metallic and sickk and that.
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 2:05 pm
				by RmoniK
				MoonUnit wrote:Hey I'm a little confused about the rate CV pot on the phaser.
I wanted to synch it to an external LFO and it sounds like the CV sent from the LFO triggers an increase in the on-board LFO's speed.
Is this correct?
The rate itself is already basically an LFO. So what you're doing is LFO'ing the rate of that LFO. If you want to sync the actual phaser, you're gonna have to do it manually, there is no sync.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 10:25 pm
				by ehbes
				Or you can use pulsar
			 
			
					
				Re: ll
				Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 6:09 am
				by cent4ur
				RmoniK wrote:All of these comments are dead wrong, this is what's really happening and it's been bugging the hell out of me ever since i started producing:
The thing is, tape mode reverses the phase. I've checked, it's true, it just turns the damn signal around. If you want to use it in parallel (as a send) properly, you're gonna have to reverse the phase again, with a thor for instance.
oh i think you're the only person that checked and understood the phase problem. how come? are you from outerspace??? 

 
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 12:47 pm
				by RmoniK
				There was a question, i provided an answer (unlike the others just making assumptions and going "it's probably ..."). How hard is it to check a waveform...
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:10 pm
				by MoonUnit
				Learned something cool the other day (as inspired by Props new synth in the online store)... you can take a synth and hook it up to a vocoder so it acts as the voice and modulates another synth. If the vocoder were a more transparent this could be a game changer.
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:13 pm
				by MoonUnit
				ehbrums1 wrote:Or you can use pulsar
Wow coming back to my own problem after more time with Reason im now realizing a simple solution... Pulsar to CV input of combinator then into the combinator programmer and use CV1 to modulate phaser frequency. BOOM
 
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:43 am
				by Ledger
				Favorite RE synth? I've been testing Predator, Parsec, Tres, & Viking. I like Parsec, but it is too thin imo, although it has some awesome filters. I'm just trying to find a great synth for bass other than the stock synths because each bass always sounds the same out of each without going through hours of resampling.
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:59 pm
				by ehbes
				Are there any good strings RE's y'all can recommend? NN-xt isn't cutting it anymore
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 11:48 am
				by RmoniK
				I don't think there are many rompler RE's out there yet apart for radical piano.
			 
			
					
				Re: The Reason Q&A Thread
				Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:26 am
				by ehbes
				that needs to be fixed, i really wish they would release an SDK for RE's