Re: Vaccine conspiracy theory - the real effects
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:51 am
lol @ anti vaxxers
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
badger wrote:i think you mean antibodies. when you get an illness your body's white blood cells attack the pathogen and in doing so they basically learn how to defeat it and create antibodies in order to counteract it in the future. vaccines give you the disease they are made to protect you against in a very small dose so that the body learns how to defeat it and so when you get a real dose of the disease your body has the antibodies in place to defeat it without getting ill
this is why some vaccines temporarily make you ill and cause short term side effects
you're in proper tnuc mode today aren't you?hackman wrote:yes that's exactly what the gcse biology texbook on vaccination says
Because they're peer-reviewed, tested and revised and only released years after they were originally written and more than just bits of texts on a 2001 Lycos page.hackman wrote:why are articles written by your scientists/doctors better than mine?
I didn't call you a criminal. I do think you're a very confident young man who's been alienated from society. I see many things in your belief system that I believed around your age and I wish looking back that someone had had the ability to show me what a dick I was being.hackman wrote:i don't want people to respect my opinions, couldn't care less
i want people to not label me as criminal for expressing my freedom of thought!
if that's the case, why bother with the vaccine? just get measles, you'll be ill once then that's it, and if you were meant to die then you were meant to die lol*grand* wrote:Hackman, what sows your text book say? And thanks badger that's what I thought. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger, I thought that was the basic idea behind them.
badger wrote:you're in proper tnuc mode today aren't you?hackman wrote:yes that's exactly what the gcse biology texbook on vaccination says
grand asked about it so i answered
that's exactly the point isn't it? not everyone lives in the west and is able to overcome illnesses like thishackman wrote:because we live in the west and we have a great quality of life whoooopie
the fuck does that even mean? people can overcome illness anywhere lolbadger wrote:not everyone lives in the west and is able to overcome illnesses like this
can't be arsed arguing any more with you but i'll make one last post in this threadhackman wrote:the fuck does that even mean? people can overcome illness anywhere lolbadger wrote:not everyone lives in the west and is able to overcome illnesses like this
But with outdated medicine, no clean water, no proper sanitation or proper food, it can become quite a bit more tricky than it is in the West.hackman wrote:the fuck does that even mean? people can overcome illness anywhere lolbadger wrote:not everyone lives in the west and is able to overcome illnesses like this
Hackman, if you read one of my earlier post that's exactly what I said, however that is not the case in much of the developing world. Tbh, what is this all about? This has been an educational thread, but i think its time for all parties to sum up there stances on vaccinations and then to agree to disagree if that they don't go hand in hand.hackman wrote:if that's the case, why bother with the vaccine? just get measles, you'll be ill once then that's it, and if you were meant to die then you were meant to die lol*grand* wrote:Hackman, what sows your text book say? And thanks badger that's what I thought. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger, I thought that was the basic idea behind them.
you're not going to get polio these days, or cholera, or whatever, because we live in the west and we have a great quality of life whoooopie
don't think that's true, it only takes a generation or two to become lax for the disease to come back. which is why it's important for everyone to get vaccinated so it can be totally eradicated.*grand* wrote: I believe vaccinations are not so necessary if you live in say the UK, however if I lived in Bangladesh, I would view them as very necessary.
badger wrote:are you really suggesting that someone who is malnourished and already in poor health, living in squalid conditions in a poor country with awful health care is going to have an equal chance of surviving an illness as an internet warrior living in a comfortable house in a country with free health care
Genevieve wrote:But with outdated medicine, no clean water, no proper sanitation or proper food, it can become quite a bit more tricky than it is in the West.hackman wrote:the fuck does that even mean? people can overcome illness anywhere lolbadger wrote:not everyone lives in the west and is able to overcome illnesses like this
*grand* wrote:Hackman, if you read one of my earlier post that's exactly what I said, however that is not the case in much of the developing world. Tbh, what is this all about? This has been an educational thread, but i think its time for all parties to sum up there stances on vaccinations and then to agree to disagree if that they don't go hand in hand.hackman wrote:if that's the case, why bother with the vaccine? just get measles, you'll be ill once then that's it, and if you were meant to die then you were meant to die lol*grand* wrote:Hackman, what sows your text book say? And thanks badger that's what I thought. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger, I thought that was the basic idea behind them.
you're not going to get polio these days, or cholera, or whatever, because we live in the west and we have a great quality of life whoooopie
I believe vaccinations are not so necessary if you live in say the UK, however if I lived in Bangladesh, I would view them as very necessary.
Each country merits a different approach in terms of vaccination programs.
Grand
Badger isn't arguing about that. He's asking if people that live in such conditions in, among other places, Africa, should not be vaccinated either. Regardless of their incapability of dealing with the illness.hackman wrote:badger wrote:are you really suggesting that someone who is malnourished and already in poor health, living in squalid conditions in a poor country with awful health care is going to have an equal chance of surviving an illness as an internet warrior living in a comfortable house in a country with free health care
no, if you could read you would see that i said this difference is the explanation for the prevailability of disease in non western countries, rather than availability of vaccination
EPIC SMH U TURNIP