Page 5 of 18
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:59 pm
by deadly_habit
AfterEmpire wrote:deadly habit wrote:Kes-Es wrote:nowaysj wrote:If it is cool to like the deep, where are all the cool people? All I see is filth children.
Not cool per say, bad word choice, just trendy round here, even former bro heads wind up making garage and deep tunes if they get in far enough, just how it spins on the DSF.
you can only make so many variations before the general public catch on when you use the same bass patches and drum kits repeatedly

I have to disagree, as with anything, an infinite number of variations can be made. Not to mention theres so many more drum kits and patches to be made/used.
it was a joke
pointing out how most of the stuff sounds like it's the same patches and kits

Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:02 pm
by bassinine
it seems DSF runs on an extremely biased two party system.
it's fucking annoying that everything has to classified into a genre before anyone will even bother forming an opinion on it.
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:04 pm
by AfterEmpire
oooooooooooooooo
then i completely retract my last comment Mister Habit!
I try pretty hard to make original patches just cuz i wanna sound more original myself, but i DO notice most heads sound pretty similar, which is kinda odd to me, cuz i havent really ever stumbled upon a sound that sounded quite like what EVERYONE and their mom has seemed to achieve.
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:44 pm
by Kes-Es
Honestly, I don't think I've ever found my way into an overused patch sound, I've tried, so hard.
soooooo harrrddddd
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:48 pm
by Kes-Es
bassinine wrote:it seems DSF runs on an extremely biased two party system.
it's fucking annoying that everything has to classified into a genre before anyone will even bother forming an opinion on it.
I agree with you mostly, I'm not one dimensional about this stuff, either, I make music on both sides of the argument( evidence in my sig), and generally just think it's dumb that everyone picks a side round here.
Just how it goes though.
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:13 pm
by AfterEmpire
I'm not one dimensional either, just never tried my hand at a deep tune yet. Maybe its time...
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:22 pm
by mks
I've never tried to make bro...
But to be honest I don't think there is just two sides of Filth and Deep. There are many other permutations.
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:04 pm
by Augment
mks wrote:I've never tried to make bro...
But to be honest I don't think there is just two sides of Filth and Deep. There are many other permutations.
yeah, but still there's lots of people who just see those two sides. And the worst part is when they decide that everything bro or deep is shit

Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:16 pm
by AfterEmpire
100% agree with the above comment. Sure there are a lotta divisions, but shit man, Deep aint my cup of tea, but if i hear a song that is deep and kicks ass im not gonna slander the track. Folks should be a little more open minded cuz its pretty much what were here for anyways. One person likes to listen to some dubstep and chill out, where i like to get hyped and pumped up.
Were all brothers of the same cause folks!

Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:16 pm
by nowaysj
AfterEmpire wrote:chill out
EPIC -->

<-- EPIC
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:03 am
by Dystinkt
Its silly trying to classify dubstep into deep and bro, eventually you run up to something thats neither, you could argue that most tunes either branch off into a deeper sound or a more pumped up in your face sound but even then with some tunes its a grey area to classify them. you wouldnt ever put mala with bro heads or excision with the deep heads but where do you stick producers like Jakes and Coki?
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:09 am
by Siderealdb
Don't classify, just love whatever shakes your scrotum.
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:10 am
by oprs
Siderealdb wrote:Don't classify, just love whatever shakes your scrotum.
will you shake my scrotum please?

Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:14 am
by Siderealdb
oprs wrote:Siderealdb wrote:Don't classify, just love whatever shakes your scrotum.
will you shake my scrotum please?

I'd have to love you first. Catch 22 homie, I hope you find the one though. Sure Chad would get jealous anyways.

Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:36 am
by 5-0-what
im in with the OG's
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:15 am
by AfterEmpire
nowaysj wrote:AfterEmpire wrote:chill out
EPIC -->

<-- EPIC
Can't tell if ur trying to clown or not bro. Ur message is vague.

Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:05 am
by nowaysj
To you! hehehe

Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:21 am
by Biscuit
Just saw this thread. Old man here wants in.
Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:00 am
by Debaser1
Kes-Es wrote:
soooooo harrrddddd
That's what she said

Re: Official* Youngsters Vs. Old Men Tune Battle
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:11 pm
by zerbaman
Youngster here. You oldies will get robbed for your false teeth when I start dropping tunes!
