Page 5 of 7
Re: 50,000 watts, am i missing something?
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:19 pm
by Jennifer
rekorder wrote:Jennifer wrote:rekorder wrote:Jennifer wrote:moving_ninja wrote:
When you started this thread.. did you expect someone to say..
"Oh yeh.. there is that sound around the 32 bar mark which I think you didn't notice"
The only thing this thread was meant to do if you ask me was fish for other people who don't like this track so that you could feel some confidence in making an opinion for your self.. why? Serioulsy.. I want to know what drives someone to spend their time doing this.
This forum is getting more and more cluttered with discussions made just to vent problems with no hope of a constructive outcome..
I agree with moving ninja.
Suck Up
haha could you give me a reason why i'd want to suck up to moving ninja? don't even know him please
http://www.boomkat.com/item.cfm?id=27838
and??
Re: 50,000 watts, am i missing something?
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:26 pm
by Jubz
he thinks your one of them groupie bitches.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:28 pm
by thoughtbombing
Big up Matty G, Skynet, Tes La Rok, Loefah, Nick Argon, and everyone associated with the absolutely fucking BADMAN tunes coming out of Argon Records.
Not a single tune on the label that I don't own. I think it says something about Dubstep being a legit and wholely seperate entity from it's parent genre's, that there are the level of haters we have achieved. If there was already a topic about the tune(and there was, about 500 of them really...) why not post the opinion there, instead of creating a topic specifically for the hate?
By providing negative energy, you are still providing energy for the tune that you hate... instead of hating something, why not try loving something else, and don't give that thing which you despise the energy or another topic about it... you just sold probably 50 more copies of this release with your actions.
Positively reinforce the things which you do like, and you will have taken that energy from that which you despise.
Re: 50,000 watts, am i missing something?
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:30 pm
by thoughtbombing
yea, thats a good reason to suck up to Moving Ninja... maybe because the tunes are ill.
Re: 50,000 watts, am i missing something?
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:30 pm
by Jennifer
ThoughtBombing wrote:
yea, thats a good reason to suck up to Moving Ninja... maybe because the tunes are ill.
lol i don't care who you are. i don't suck up to anyone.
if i want to chat with someone i'll just say hello
Re: 50,000 watts, am i missing something?
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:32 pm
by thoughtbombing
Jennifer wrote:lol i don't care who you are. i don't suck up to anyone.
if i want to chat with someone i'll just say hello
Well, to each her own, I guess. I'll personally be sucking up.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:49 pm
by mayorquimby
ThoughtBombing wrote:Big up Matty G, Skynet, Tes La Rok, Loefah, Nick Argon, and everyone associated with the absolutely fucking BADMAN tunes coming out of Argon Records.
Not a single tune on the label that I don't own. I think it says something about Dubstep being a legit and wholely seperate entity from it's parent genre's, that there are the level of haters we have achieved. If there was already a topic about the tune(and there was, about 500 of them really...) why not post the opinion there, instead of creating a topic specifically for the hate?
By providing negative energy, you are still providing energy for the tune that you hate... instead of hating something, why not try loving something else, and don't give that thing which you despise the energy or another topic about it... you just sold probably 50 more copies of this release with your actions.
Positively reinforce the things which you do like, and you will have taken that energy from that which you despise.
Welcome to the hippy forum.
If you read the whole thread you would of noticed the post i made 'bigging up' Matty and some of his other productions. I sincerely apologise for expressing my opinion, i didnt notice any other posts on the subject.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:20 pm
by thoughtbombing
I only responded to the original post and the original intent. I couldn't be bothered to read and respond individually to 300 posts, which is what I'd have been doing.
Don't be sarcastic, friend. There is no need for it in this case. You are free to express your opinions... hell, you can do whatever you want--I was simply pointing out that you just gave a ton of free press to the tune/producer/label(not that it was needed, in fact it wasn't...)
I simply was wondering aloud... why would someone not use the Search Engine? It's just been discussed a ton, is all. The energy used on this topic was wasted on negative, when it could have been used to create something positive. That isn't a Hippy philosophy... it should be standard practice.
Re: 50,000 watts, am i missing something?
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:04 pm
by rekordah
jesus it was just a joke! no offence meant
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:22 pm
by thoughtbombing
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:24 pm
by konehed
fookin party tune, not really something for solo listening
Re: 50,000 watts, am i missing something?
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:24 pm
by Jennifer
rekorder wrote:
jesus it was just a joke! no offence meant
naw don't worry, i wasn't offended lol
Re: 50,000 watts, am i missing something?
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:25 pm
by rekordah
Jennifer wrote:
naw don't worry, i wasn't offended lol
kewl
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:38 pm
by rekordah
d.three wrote:ramadanman wrote:rekorder wrote:cogi wrote:System tune, you can't feel the pressure on a small system
dont we want dubstep to be more than club bangas tho?
doesn't make it a club banger - just that you need soundsystem level bass pressure to fully appreciate the tune
that's where I heard it first - at DMZ... would appreciate it to have it in my bag to drop it if it comes to this, na'what I mean!
dont get me wrong, i think it is a good tune, but if u think it's only good on a big system and it doesnt captivate u otherwise then surely u shouldnt think its that great.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:47 pm
by thoughtbombing
rekorder wrote:dont get me wrong, i think it is a good tune, but if u think it's only good on a big system and it doesnt captivate u otherwise then surely u shouldnt think its that great.
Nothing sounds good on laptop speakers, or little crappy JBL/Boston Acoustics joints that come with a computer. Its hard to grasp what this tune can do, until you are about to fall unconscious because you can't breath.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:15 pm
by rekordah
ThoughtBombing wrote:
Nothing sounds good on laptop speakers, or little crappy JBL/Boston Acoustics joints that come with a computer.
1. i've heard it at DMZ
2. my PC is hooked up 2 rather nice monitors.
and yes i do think that a really good tune should be able to captivate you on crappy computer speakers! obviously not to the fullest extent but quite alot.
ThoughtBombing wrote:Its hard to grasp what this tune can do, until you are about to fall unconscious because you can't breath.
i think u have respiratory problems.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:23 pm
by hera
nice pancho.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:28 pm
by rekordah
hera wrote:nice pancho.
why thank u my dear, got it at miss selfridge.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:32 pm
by thoughtbombing
rekorder wrote:ThoughtBombing wrote:Its hard to grasp what this tune can do, until you are about to fall unconscious because you can't breath.
i think u have respiratory problems.
I'm not the only one. Pretty sure I've heard of a person falling out when this tune was played.
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:42 pm
by rekordah
ThoughtBombing wrote:rekorder wrote:ThoughtBombing wrote:Its hard to grasp what this tune can do, until you are about to fall unconscious because you can't breath.
i think u have respiratory problems.
I'm not the only one. Pretty sure I've heard of a person falling out when this tune was played.
then trading standards should be in that clubs case!
