Page 5 of 6

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:24 pm
by nobody
nothing to hide lol, ever smoked a joint in front of your telly?

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:28 pm
by mason666
yh but what the polis gonna do lol

are they gonna happen to be watchign my tv feed out of millions and then raid my house for a joint

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 3:12 am
by mks
Guys, this is all running on outdated protocols with TCP/IP basically built on top of them. I'm talking about SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems running PLC's (Programmable Logic Controllers). These are controlling our energy infrastructure, nuclear power plants etc., down to our stoplights. I have done MITM (Man In The Middle) attacks in a closed environment on some PLC's for an Industrial Security class, and these PLC's and protocols are very vulnerable.

Image

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:11 am
by _ronzlo_
Of course they are. They're run by old pennypinchers who still don't understand this stuff and balk at the costs of upgrading to sufficient levels. Not unlike Sony.

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:38 am
by nowaysj
Probably worse than Sony, but with nuclear implications.

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:55 am
by mks
Sony is a good example though in regards to the fact that if it was indeed North Korea that was behind the attack, there are reports that they have a 3000 person strong cyber attack army. Who knows how many the US and the UK have.

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:21 am
by soronery
everything will become clear once we switch to ndn protocol

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:59 pm
by OGLemon
mks wrote:
[+] Spoiler
Guys, this is all running on outdated protocols with TCP/IP basically built on top of them. I'm talking about SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems running PLC's (Programmable Logic Controllers). These are controlling our energy infrastructure, nuclear power plants etc., down to our stoplights. I have done MITM (Man In The Middle) attacks in a closed environment on some PLC's for an Industrial Security class, and these PLC's and protocols are very vulnerable.

Image
you should make a die hard movie

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 4:48 pm
by _ronzlo_
New robot:


Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:44 am
by mks
OGLemon wrote:
mks wrote:
[+] Spoiler
Guys, this is all running on outdated protocols with TCP/IP basically built on top of them. I'm talking about SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems running PLC's (Programmable Logic Controllers). These are controlling our energy infrastructure, nuclear power plants etc., down to our stoplights. I have done MITM (Man In The Middle) attacks in a closed environment on some PLC's for an Industrial Security class, and these PLC's and protocols are very vulnerable.

Image
you should make a die hard movie
What, Die Hard for geeks? That would be an interesting movie.

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 6:59 am
by sixs
in 2025 we will be smoking joints wwith our telly

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 7:39 am
by nousd
and sitting around chatting shit with my bestie, the vacuum cleaner


(nice to revive a wbu thread
with 2nd poster 3rdi)

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:06 am
by cyclopian
mks wrote:
OGLemon wrote:
mks wrote:
[+] Spoiler
Guys, this is all running on outdated protocols with TCP/IP basically built on top of them. I'm talking about SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems running PLC's (Programmable Logic Controllers). These are controlling our energy infrastructure, nuclear power plants etc., down to our stoplights. I have done MITM (Man In The Middle) attacks in a closed environment on some PLC's for an Industrial Security class, and these PLC's and protocols are very vulnerable.

Image
you should make a die hard movie
What, Die Hard for geeks? That would be an interesting movie.
[+] Spoiler
Image

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:48 pm
by finji
wub is still here :X

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:19 pm
by ultraspatial
topmo3 wrote:it's not the fact that you don't have anything to hide just now.. it's just that in the future when everythings forbidden all our consumer electronics etc are rigged and primed to spy on us
we should shun technology and go full on gun-nut puritan doomprepper

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:46 pm
by nowaysj
Agreed.

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 3:50 pm
by _ronzlo_

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:02 pm
by nowaysj
On a couple of separate occasions I was hanging out with some HNWI's on their property, and google started serving up non sequiturious ads on my iphone, but the ads were related to a conversation we were having that was very specific. On one of the occasions the conversation (and ads) centered around a photo of a publication I had taken with my phone.

That's iphone+google.

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 4:20 am
by nobody

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:02 am
by ultraspatial
fucks sake