Page 5 of 5
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 2:11 pm
by soronery
hubb wrote:see what i did there ?
as with the last half dozen of your posts, no
but i'm willing to accept that we are in fact arguing seperate arguments from the same side.
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 2:12 pm
by hubb
sorry
did an edit
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:05 pm
by mason666
hubb wrote:It's obviously about protecting those that only need a slight push to become more of a concervative racist or whatever - that poor rightwing segment that loves the class system
- people who are right on the verge of thinking the opinions expressed aren't jokes
looooool 'protecting' people so they don't form opinions that you personally don't agree with
that may be the most fascist thing i've seen written here
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 12:11 pm
by hubb
What do you think protecting means in that situation ?
It's not about what I disagree either but with what we all disagree with.
You can't technically have the opinion that all mexicans are lazy in society.
You will get fined and so on.
Cheap comment, bro!
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 12:48 pm
by mason666
mexicans are lazy
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 12:53 pm
by hubb
sometimes yes
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:25 pm
by therapist
Is the word 'fracas' really starting to annoy anyone else?
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:59 pm
by OGLemon
the no vote really did rally
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 12:47 am
by karmacazee
LOL at everyone who thinks the BBC will lose income over this.
Dave will be repeating 'classic' Top Gear for years to come alone. The BBC own the worldwide rights to Top Gear, and the show will continue.
Remember when Angus Deayton left Have I Got News For You? It was the best thing that happened to that programme, and it got an extra 13 years out of it...
Fucking hell, the BBC really know how to milk a format!
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 12:50 am
by karmacazee
mason666 wrote:hubb wrote:It's obviously about protecting those that only need a slight push to become more of a concervative racist or whatever - that poor rightwing segment that loves the class system
- people who are right on the verge of thinking the opinions expressed aren't jokes
looooool 'protecting' people so they don't form opinions that you personally don't agree with
that may be the most fascist thing i've seen written here
You're so backwards... how do you even exist?
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 7:51 am
by mason666
Once again the 'forward thinking' lefty hippie is the one coming with the personal attacks what a surprise
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:01 am
by hubb
I think the Clarkson piggy back show is going to be good.
Each week he gets a good ride on the back of a minority.
He is going to be calling them sherpas no matter where they originate from and will make sure to comment on both odour and clothing despite wearing those pissy sheep tweeds himself.