Page 5 of 6
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:03 pm
by jred
Ashley wrote:Thomas wrote:CFour wrote:Thomas wrote:jred wrote:
That looks exactly like a Hip Hop gig to me
95% male?
95% white, 95% earth tones, 95% people with beards or shaven heads etc etc
No diss, just an observation.
Obviously a dubstep rave...isnt that nick argon in the bottom left?
its a dubstep gig in christchurch NZ(yes newzealand ass edge of the world way the fuck down here
) and it was 95% going the fuck off , the other 5% was spent out back blazing
bound ta be some long hair computernerds in there somewhere tho. just wanted ta pointout that it aint all shuffle n nod ya kno
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:22 pm
by eardrum
It's a satirical column.
We had 1000 + at last Eardrum with Magnetic Man and NType...
http://www.dontstayin.com/uk/birmingham ... ok-8850097
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:23 pm
by the night times
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:31 pm
by jonnyrebel
Is it me or did this thread die a death when night times joined, people scared to voice opinions or something?!
Why do magazines publish those opinionated articles. Its like reading richard little john (biggest tnuc in the world). They just annoy me. I have a chuckle at the wit of the writer but never take it seriously. There are those however that take these things as gospel truth and thats what pisses me off...
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:34 pm
by concept_
Jonnyrebel wrote:Is it me or did this thread die a death when night times joined, people scared to voice opinions or something?!
There are those however that take these things as gospel truth and thats what pisses me off...
I think you just answered your own question. A lot of people's opinions humbled by fact that it is satire, though not that funny.
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:43 pm
by eardrum
Jonnyrebel wrote:Is it me or did this thread die a death when night times joined, people scared to voice opinions or something?!
Why do magazines publish those opinionated articles. Its like reading richard little john (biggest tnuc in the world). They just annoy me. I have a chuckle at the wit of the writer but never take it seriously. There are those however that take these things as gospel truth and thats what pisses me off...
They publish to provoke debate. Which it has done. That can only be a good thing.
If something wasn't published or a piece of work or art or music not made or a joke not told in case the ignorant misinterpretted, then it would be a pretty dull world stuck in neutral and going nowhere.
We've been plugging away at dubstep since april 2006 when we had Youngsta down. Not the conception of dubstep but hardly last week either.
Either way I'm not going to take the artical to heart. It's satire!
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:47 pm
by spiderman
100% ignorance.
cant be bothered to pick out shit, but before i even got half way he lost ALL CREDIBILITY from some of the things he said.
he doesnt have a fuckin clue about anything he is talkin about lol.
this artical = void
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:47 pm
by jonnyrebel
concept_ wrote:Jonnyrebel wrote:Is it me or did this thread die a death when night times joined, people scared to voice opinions or something?!
There are those however that take these things as gospel truth and thats what pisses me off...
I think you just answered your own question. A lot of people's opinions humbled by fact that it is satire, though not that funny.
yea i did
Theres a difference between a single article and every page of vice...
The article was funny, im hardly expecting the guy who wrote it to come on here and start causing a rucus lol, hes doing a job I get that but do you understand what i mean when i say there are those of us who get jeremy clarkson and there are those that want him to be prime minister...
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 4:01 pm
by jred
give me an excuse ta stick up for dubstep im on it
i love it
what else can i say . satire eh .......spose kinda lame tho, dont they have anything better to write about ,meh oh well ,thing is i actual know some people who think pretty much exactly what they saying ,and with that many holes in an arguement ya gota have a pick at it
eh
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 4:29 pm
by littleredraver
When are you going to give us another main room eardrum event then mr b?
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 4:58 pm
by the night times
jred wrote:give me an excuse ta stick up for dubstep im on it
i love it
what else can i say . satire eh .......spose kinda lame tho, dont they have anything better to write about ,meh oh well ,thing is i actual know some people who think pretty much exactly what they saying ,and with that many holes in an arguement ya gota have a pick at it
eh
Awaiting your email
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 5:33 pm
by freqone
the guy who wrote this speaks alot of ignorance, but at the same time puts down a couple valid points.
Personally I can't be bothered with getting worked up over a lil' article. The said article never pulled any weight until someone decided to make it known and start an uproar about it.
I still dig dubstep bigtime and as do you, so who the fuck cares what this article has to say.
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 5:36 pm
by dubluke
Thomas wrote:dubluke wrote:lol @ some of the reactions in here, is this breh really worth getting that pissed off over? he's either taking the piss or just trying to get a reaction which he seems to have done quite well, i prefer to find the funny side of this
Yeh you keep saying that
sorry
i'm not very good at serious posts
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 5:39 pm
by dubluke
but reading on i was right!! i knew it couldn't be entirely serious
so nyeeeeeeeer!
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 5:57 pm
by djshiva
£10 Bag wrote:hahaha.
fact is, most girls don't like good music (harsh but very true)
.
i call bullshit.
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:23 pm
by plastician
I don't know what to make of this as the person who's written it has made a bigger prat of himself than anyone else could do by writing a reply
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:32 pm
by emcee child
Plastician wrote:I don't know what to make of this as the person who's written it has made a bigger prat of himself than anyone else could do by writing a reply
for reall.. it's all air untill u give it wieght by responding to it.
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:36 pm
by the night times
its all air anyway, its satire................
Although reading the whole thread helps
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:36 pm
by willis
this is a really cheap and tacky piece of journalism
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:49 pm
by epithet
jred wrote:Ashley wrote:Thomas wrote:CFour wrote:Thomas wrote:
95% male?
95% white, 95% earth tones, 95% people with beards or shaven heads etc etc
No diss, just an observation.
Obviously a dubstep rave...isnt that nick argon in the bottom left?
its a dubstep gig in christchurch NZ(yes newzealand ass edge of the world way the fuck down here
) and it was 95% going the fuck off , the other 5% was spent out back blazing
bound ta be some long hair computernerds in there somewhere tho. just wanted ta pointout that it aint all shuffle n nod ya kno
i think this long haired computer nerd can just be seen heading towards the bar
As for the piece. If you aint what it says why get offended ?