Page 5 of 8
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:16 am
by felixgash
BlizzardMusic wrote:felixGash wrote:pk- wrote:*IDs
Ah, I see.
Well unfortunately, what with the concentrated collective of noobs on here, IDs will lead to questions "what's an eye dee ess huuuuuh".
Also, I'll have you know that the use of apostrophes - when concerning acronyms - is an issue linguists and scholars have debated in recent times, with many considering implementing its use into modern, standard English.
Is my job to care about this?
1) The comment was
clearly in response to PK's, so step..
2) You're too young to have a job.
3) Is it not passed your bedtime?
4) Don't take any of this to heart, it's all love.
5) Literally still can't believe that little kid on them youtube videos that made me lol hard is you.
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:16 am
by pk-
BlizzardMusic wrote:nice
high five!
felixGash wrote:Also, I'll have you know that the use of apostrophes - when concerning acronyms - is an issue linguists and scholars have debated in recent times, with many considering implementing its use into modern, standard English.
what a load of bollock's
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:17 am
by felixgash
BlizzardMusic wrote:
But to get even,
with many considering implementing it's use into modern, standard English.
That's actually wrong. lol
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:17 am
by pk-
oh i didn't realise you two were having a real argument
sorry for adding fuel to the fire
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:18 am
by pk-
felixGash wrote:BlizzardMusic wrote:
But to get even,
with many considering implementing it's use into modern, standard English.
That's actually wrong. lol
fuck's sake blizzard, that's just cancelled out the goal i scored
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:18 am
by felixgash
pk- wrote:BlizzardMusic wrote:nice
high five!
felixGash wrote:Also, I'll have you know that the use of apostrophes - when concerning acronyms - is an issue linguists and scholars have debated in recent times, with many considering implementing its use into modern, standard English.
what a load of bollock's
No, being serious! Talked about this in a seminar about a year ago - it's to do with companies and other businesses etc. that use acronyms and don't want the extra "s" to look as though it's a part of the name.
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:19 am
by blizzardmusic
felixGash wrote:BlizzardMusic wrote:felixGash wrote:pk- wrote:*IDs
Ah, I see.
Well unfortunately, what with the concentrated collective of noobs on here, IDs will lead to questions "what's an eye dee ess huuuuuh".
Also, I'll have you know that the use of apostrophes - when concerning acronyms - is an issue linguists and scholars have debated in recent times, with many considering implementing its use into modern, standard English.
Is my job to care about this?
1) The comment was
clearly in response to PK's, so step..
2) You're too young to have a job.
3) Is it not
passed your bedtime?
4) Don't take any of this to heart, it's all love.
5) Literally still can't believe that little kid on them youtube videos that made me lol hard is you.
Past is the correct term, thanks.
You obviously cannot take a joke. By saying 'is it my job to care about this', I was showing how little I know/care about the subject.
Do you always have to bring age in to it? No. Stop. kthxbai
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:19 am
by pk-
felixGash wrote:pk- wrote:BlizzardMusic wrote:nice
high five!
felixGash wrote:Also, I'll have you know that the use of apostrophes - when concerning acronyms - is an issue linguists and scholars have debated in recent times, with many considering implementing its use into modern, standard English.
what a load of bollock's
No, being serious! Talked about this in a seminar about a year ago - it's to do with companies and other businesses etc. that use acronyms and don't want the extra "s" to look as though it's a part of the name.
i bet the fuckers are american
no offen'se
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:19 am
by felixgash
pk- wrote:felixGash wrote:BlizzardMusic wrote:
But to get even,
with many considering implementing it's use into modern, standard English.
That's actually wrong. lol
fuck's sake blizzard, that's just cancelled out the goal i scored
And I didn't realise we were "beefing" either! Blizz takes everything too seriously, the wrong way and to heart..
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:20 am
by blizzardmusic
felixGash wrote:pk- wrote:felixGash wrote:BlizzardMusic wrote:
But to get even,
with many considering implementing it's use into modern, standard English.
That's actually wrong. lol
fuck's sake blizzard, that's just cancelled out the goal i scored
And I didn't realise we were "beefing" either! Blizz takes everything too seriously, the wrong way and to heart..
We're not beefing, I'm just going along tbh.
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:20 am
by felixgash
BlizzardMusic wrote:
Past is the correct term, thanks.
It's obviously past mine..
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:21 am
by felixgash
BlizzardMusic wrote:
We're not beefing, I'm just going along tbh.
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:21 am
by hera
let's talk about chicks, man
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:21 am
by pk-
well I think we've all learnt something and become closer friends for it on page 5.
I wonder what page 6 will bring
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:22 am
by blizzardmusic
hera wrote:
let's talk about chicks, man
cute little creatures.
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:22 am
by pk-
hera wrote:
let's talk about chicks, man
stay out of it, dollface
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:22 am
by felixgash
This thread has given me all sorts of emotions.
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:23 am
by pk-
oh by the way felixgash
i take it all back. it's easily done, isn't it?
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:23 am
by blizzardmusic
felixGash wrote:
This thread has given me all sorts of emotions.
i started off laughing at you and datura's argument, and i'm now/was arguing with you. weird how i turn on people so quickly.
sorry man!
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:23 am
by felixgash
What do you mean pk-?