Re: Brostep / Skrillex and the Forum.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:15 am
skrillex reminds me of this track so much
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
dubstep inspired by dub? why i never would have thought.....reanzstarr wrote:I noticed whilst speaking to many of my yank friends that they weren't truly aware of the origin of dubstep, to them it has always been (and most likely always will be) the screaming womp womp zzzeididibn of Skrillex. Many were quite surprised that early a lot of early dubstep was largely inspired by dub itself, despite the obvious genre name. Now this isn't a thread to bash such and such or another, I'm just interested in hearing peoples opinions of why dubstep turned from El-B into Skrillex, and when it did so? A musical history if you will.
It must do partly. How else do you explain the whole 'it was a toss up between raggage and dubstep' thing? It has in common with dub a far more pronounced bass and a greater focus on sound systems than garage had. And even the early dubstep tracks had this. I know it partly comes from the whole dub as an instrumental thing but you can't say it has nothing to do with dub. Didn't Hatcha coin the term 'dubstep' to describe the dubby 2-step records Benny Ill was bringing into Big Apple early on?garethom wrote:Nothing changed into anything. If you want the El-B sound, then there's still people out there, namely Sully.
Not like somebody came along and forced Digital Mystikz to start making brostep.
Also, the dub in the name dubstep doesn't refer to dub music, although there is undoubtedly some that is influenced by dub.
I did say that some of it is influenced by Dub man, just not the name. As far as I'm aware (maybe someone more involved in the early days can correct me) was that yeah, it came from the dub side of the 2-step records.leyenda303 wrote:It must do partly. How else do you explain the whole 'it was a toss up between raggage and dubstep' thing? It has in common with dub a far more pronounced bass and a greater focus on sound systems than garage had. And even the early dubstep tracks had this. I know it partly comes from the whole dub as an instrumental thing but you can't say it has nothing to do with dub. Didn't Hatcha coin the term 'dubstep' to describe the dubby 2-step records Benny Ill was bringing into Big Apple early on?garethom wrote:Nothing changed into anything. If you want the El-B sound, then there's still people out there, namely Sully.
Not like somebody came along and forced Digital Mystikz to start making brostep.
Also, the dub in the name dubstep doesn't refer to dub music, although there is undoubtedly some that is influenced by dub.
I mean the US has really taken the sound and ran with it but it didn't originate here. Flux and doctor P are both from England, and Datsik is from canada. That being said, a lot of the terrible "filthy" dubstep comes from the US today.Lectric wrote:it happened because americans got a hold of it, and since the USA is all about making things bigger and exploiting them for all theyre worth, the genre was raped for all it was good for, and is now the electronic version of death metal.
or maybe im just grumpy.
keep the sub vibes alive, my fellow heads.
Nah, I agree with you man that there is and always has been dubstep that hasn't been overtly dub influenced. But using dub in the instrumental sense comes from dub music in the first place where it's a case of taking reggae, removing the vocals and bringing the bass and percussion of the track to the fore. This same approach, borrowed from dub, was a defining feature of dubstep. I see why you corrected the guy though as the way as the way he was talking did make it sound like they were solely king tubby clones at the beginninggarethom wrote:I did say that some of it is influenced by Dub man, just not the name. As far as I'm aware (maybe someone more involved in the early days can correct me) was that yeah, it came from the dub side of the 2-step records.leyenda303 wrote:It must do partly. How else do you explain the whole 'it was a toss up between raggage and dubstep' thing? It has in common with dub a far more pronounced bass and a greater focus on sound systems than garage had. And even the early dubstep tracks had this. I know it partly comes from the whole dub as an instrumental thing but you can't say it has nothing to do with dub. Didn't Hatcha coin the term 'dubstep' to describe the dubby 2-step records Benny Ill was bringing into Big Apple early on?garethom wrote:Nothing changed into anything. If you want the El-B sound, then there's still people out there, namely Sully.
Not like somebody came along and forced Digital Mystikz to start making brostep.
Also, the dub in the name dubstep doesn't refer to dub music, although there is undoubtedly some that is influenced by dub.
You think stuff like "Skank", "Red", "The Judgement" sound like Dub music? I dunno, don't wanna get into a war about semantics. My point was about the OP acting like most of the early dubstep producers were making King Tubby-esque sounds haha.
Ahh yeah, I guess so, that's a good point. Was thinking purely in terms of name rather than techniques used.leyenda303 wrote:Nah, I agree with you man that there is and always has been dubstep that hasn't been overtly dub influenced. But using dub in the instrumental sense comes from dub music in the first place where it's a case of taking reggae, removing the vocals and bringing the bass and percussion of the track to the fore. This same approach, borrowed from dub, was a defining feature of dubstep. I see why you corrected the guy though as the way as the way he was talking did make it sound like they were solely king tubby clones at the beginninggarethom wrote:I did say that some of it is influenced by Dub man, just not the name. As far as I'm aware (maybe someone more involved in the early days can correct me) was that yeah, it came from the dub side of the 2-step records.leyenda303 wrote:It must do partly. How else do you explain the whole 'it was a toss up between raggage and dubstep' thing? It has in common with dub a far more pronounced bass and a greater focus on sound systems than garage had. And even the early dubstep tracks had this. I know it partly comes from the whole dub as an instrumental thing but you can't say it has nothing to do with dub. Didn't Hatcha coin the term 'dubstep' to describe the dubby 2-step records Benny Ill was bringing into Big Apple early on?garethom wrote:Nothing changed into anything. If you want the El-B sound, then there's still people out there, namely Sully.
Not like somebody came along and forced Digital Mystikz to start making brostep.
Also, the dub in the name dubstep doesn't refer to dub music, although there is undoubtedly some that is influenced by dub.
You think stuff like "Skank", "Red", "The Judgement" sound like Dub music? I dunno, don't wanna get into a war about semantics. My point was about the OP acting like most of the early dubstep producers were making King Tubby-esque sounds haha.
ya, cuz death metal is such a sell out genre hahaLectric wrote:it happened because americans got a hold of it, and since the USA is all about making things bigger and exploiting them for all theyre worth, the genre was raped for all it was good for, and is now the electronic version of death metal.
or maybe im just grumpy.
keep the sub vibes alive, my fellow heads.