Dubstepforum.com

ehbrums1 wrote:

wub wrote:(Deux means two in European)

You kid right wub ?

Yes, yes I do.


The title of this thread is actually taken from the film Hot Shots - Part Deux! featuring Charlie Sheen.

So that mean this thread is bi-winning

What did I say that was baseless?

"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"

Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

What did I say that was baseless?

"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"

Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?

Even so, I still didn't say anything that was baseless. The threads were old. The 200+ page one was locked. My comments, if anything, were mired in easily proven facts.


And again, you have a 45+ page thread here all about Brostep...what more do you want to discuss this particular sub-genre?

What do you mean censored? Mods are pretty open about stuff as long as its of a law abiding nature......usually

i'm with wub 100%

you want to talk about how much you love/hate skrillex? this is the thread for you. if we left all the hate threads open, this place would get very dull soon as there is only so much you can say about something you hate and all of it has been said before... how about instead of wasting your time complaining about what you don't like, you make some threads/posts about stuff you do like? you might turn people on to some stuff they've never heard before... at the very least you'll be doing something positive

Can you just censor this guy completely for trying to speak his mind and just ban him or some shit?

no

ehbrums1 wrote:What do you mean censored? Mods are pretty open about stuff as long as its of a law abiding nature......usually

except tits

tits became illegal in '10...

wub wrote:

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

What did I say that was baseless?

"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"

Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?

Even so, I still didn't say anything that was baseless. The threads were old. The 200+ page one was locked. My comments, if anything, were mired in easily proven facts.


And again, you have a 45+ page thread here all about Brostep...what more do you want to discuss this particular sub-genre?

wub wrote:

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

What did I say that was baseless?

"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"

Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?

Even so, I still didn't say anything that was baseless. The threads were old. The 200+ page one was locked. My comments, if anything, were mired in easily proven facts.


And again, you have a 45+ page thread here all about Brostep...what more do you want to discuss this particular sub-genre?

Clearly talking about music he enjoys is a waste. Doesn't it make sense to fill the forum with threads about music we don't like? I swear sometimes the mods can be so stubborn...

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

wub wrote:

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

What did I say that was baseless?

"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"

Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?

Even so, I still didn't say anything that was baseless. The threads were old. The 200+ page one was locked. My comments, if anything, were mired in easily proven facts.


And again, you have a 45+ page thread here all about Brostep...what more do you want to discuss this particular sub-genre?

Not necessarily....

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

Ok, so you don't want to actually discuss it - you just want to post over-used JPGs to highlight the situation and your feelings toward it...your call.

Incidentally, the 'before' pic was taken in, what, 2005? Given that your profile says you're 20, you'd have been 13 when it was shot...was 13yr old you hitting the underground parties to discover 'true dubstep' sounds for yourself back then?

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

wub wrote:

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

What did I say that was baseless?

"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"

Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?

Even so, I still didn't say anything that was baseless. The threads were old. The 200+ page one was locked. My comments, if anything, were mired in easily proven facts.


And again, you have a 45+ page thread here all about Brostep...what more do you want to discuss this particular sub-genre?

Bro. I'm so glad there's finally somebody like you posting on the forum. You're just so raw and edgy man. These people on here just don't get us. We don't need to talk about things. We have memes and catchy photos that say what we can't put into words bro.

Fcuk all the h8trz main.

wub wrote:

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

Ok, so you don't want to actually discuss it - you just want to post over-used JPGs to highlight the situation and your feelings toward it...your call.

Incidentally, the 'before' pic was taken in, what, 2005? Given that your profile says you're 20, you'd have been 13 when it was shot...was 13yr old you hitting the underground parties to discover 'true dubstep' sounds for yourself back then?

inb4 sonika did it.

wub wrote:

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

Ok, so you don't want to actually discuss it - you just want to post over-used JPGs to highlight the situation and your feelings toward it...your call.

Incidentally, the 'before' pic was taken in, what, 2005? Given that your profile says you're 20, you'd have been 13 when it was shot...was 13yr old you hitting the underground parties to discover 'true dubstep' sounds for yourself back then?

+1 wub

wub wrote:

Warfare Dubstep wrote:

Ok, so you don't want to actually discuss it - you just want to post over-used JPGs to highlight the situation and your feelings toward it...your call.

Incidentally, the 'before' pic was taken in, what, 2005? Given that your profile says you're 20, you'd have been 13 when it was shot...was 13yr old you hitting the underground parties to discover 'true dubstep' sounds for yourself back then?

The meme describes my point fully without me having to type an essay that will be too long to read.

I actually found out about dubstep when I listened to Skream on the net at the age of 15, before that I listened to DnB, and still do today.

So your issue is that commercial Dubstep now doesn't sound like underground Dubstep did back then?

dude if the nights you're going to look anything like the second picture... ur doin it rong