Dubstepforum.com

this forum is super fuckin wack.

not everybody can taste the soup

Some people think the soup is a load of bollocks and dont tip.

I was just frowning upon the youtube video.
I can't deny there are a lot of returning geometric patterns in nature, since we see them everywhere, but I wouldn't connect them to the existence of a higher force.

Anyway, some q's.
- Split op which diamonds on which walls?
- I don't see the bass cleff or the skull-horns in the chandelier

i'm just pointing out symbols

just because freemasons are the only ones making movies and communicate via symbols in every film does not mean that i am trying to prove to you the existence of god.

and whats to frown about the youtube video. how dense are you?

Parson wrote:just because freemasons are the only ones making movies and communicate via symbols

ok that's it I'm out

thank you

for those who are interested, here's some explanation on the symbols they use and what they mean
http://www.code144.com/

HOLLYWOOD = HOLY WOOD
wood from holly is what is used to make MAGIC WANDS

Not to mention various other wood based products. I think symbolism in american culture is much more interesting. From the very little I know about it

neil gaiman isn't the sort of bloke to get caught up in such stuff with out explicitly explaining it/

Firky wrote:neil gaiman isn't the sort of bloke to get caught up in such stuff with out explicitly explaining it/

Speaking of which, is the any news on a possible Sandman movie?

Firky wrote:neil gaiman isn't the sort of bloke to get caught up in such stuff with out explicitly explaining it/

the opposite is true. i just went through and did grandmas boy which i am about to post up. and then i'm gonna do hamlet 2 to prove a point to somebody else.

then i can do a neil gaiman movie of your choosing. that dude is illuminated like a mofo

more of this mate

NilsFG wrote:

Parson wrote:just because freemasons are the only ones making movies and communicate via symbols

ok that's it I'm out

why don't i get this in my threads and all sort of dudes insist sometimes to stay where their attitude is not welcomed?
not that nils' attitude here is any wrong

otherwise, this sounds a bit like the fake astrology, you can find some of those symbols in my house too i guess, and for sure on some chinese underwear i just bought, not such a big deal...

i give you this: finances in movie making in US are interesting and for sure not everybody gets a big budget just because has talent and good ideas
but masons communicating privately through films doesn't make much sense, there's cheaper ways, it ain't public communication either, as the symbols are too esoteric, so i guess you need a better explanation for this

alien pimp wrote:i give you this: finances in movie making in US are interesting and for sure not everybody gets a big budget just because has talent and good ideas
but masons communicating privately through films doesn't make much sense, there's cheaper ways, it ain't public communication either, as the symbols are too esoteric, so i guess you need a better explanation for this

Mozart's The Magic Flute is loaded with masonic symbols and stuff - not as a way of communicating or anything, more as a sort of in-joke for him and his mates.

Not 100% convinced by Coraline, though - if you're going to point at the presence of circles and diamond shapes as evidence of something being run by masons then I've got some serious concerns about who's secretly controlling my biscuit tin...

i will give you the pine cones...but nothing else is convincing

the thing that makes "sacred geometry" special is that appears naturally...so eventually its going to pop up on film without the film maker intentionally doing anything other than creating something visually stimulating

as for communicating through movies....that's nonsense, they could have a secure line easily, why run the risk of someone "decoding" your message in a public movie...that's if you even believe the masons are still doing sketchy things

Slothrop wrote:

alien pimp wrote:i give you this: finances in movie making in US are interesting and for sure not everybody gets a big budget just because has talent and good ideas
but masons communicating privately through films doesn't make much sense, there's cheaper ways, it ain't public communication either, as the symbols are too esoteric, so i guess you need a better explanation for this

Mozart's The Magic Flute is loaded with masonic symbols and stuff - not as a way of communicating or anything, more as a sort of in-joke for him and his mates.

in-jokes are a much more plausible explanation, but doesn't work here much

alien pimp wrote:

Slothrop wrote:

alien pimp wrote:i give you this: finances in movie making in US are interesting and for sure not everybody gets a big budget just because has talent and good ideas
but masons communicating privately through films doesn't make much sense, there's cheaper ways, it ain't public communication either, as the symbols are too esoteric, so i guess you need a better explanation for this

Mozart's The Magic Flute is loaded with masonic symbols and stuff - not as a way of communicating or anything, more as a sort of in-joke for him and his mates.

in-jokes are a much more plausible explanation, but doesn't work here much

Dunno, actually. Maybe not, but Neil Gaiman is to random bits of mythology and occultism as Quentin Tarantino is to obscure trashy films... not sure about the pinecones, but I wouldn't entirely put the mandalas past him.

Slothrop wrote:

alien pimp wrote:

Slothrop wrote:

alien pimp wrote:i give you this: finances in movie making in US are interesting and for sure not everybody gets a big budget just because has talent and good ideas
but masons communicating privately through films doesn't make much sense, there's cheaper ways, it ain't public communication either, as the symbols are too esoteric, so i guess you need a better explanation for this

Mozart's The Magic Flute is loaded with masonic symbols and stuff - not as a way of communicating or anything, more as a sort of in-joke for him and his mates.

in-jokes are a much more plausible explanation, but doesn't work here much

Dunno, actually. Maybe not, but Neil Gaiman is to random bits of mythology and occultism as Quentin Tarantino is to obscure trashy films... not sure about the pinecones, but I wouldn't entirely put the mandalas past him.

that's a long way to say shit is not solid here...