and tbh it just looks like the vst version of FL...
anyone know how this can be done?
any help appreciated..
Ta!
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:55 pm
by DZA
Benga uses a pc with logic 5.5
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:20 pm
by Arshaw
DZA wrote:Benga uses a pc with logic 5.5
:s i thought 5.5 looked worse than that...
cheers ne way.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:22 pm
by Demos
bootcamp?
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:23 pm
by Architecture
why in the hell would you want FL on a mac?!
That makes as much sense as putting a Ford Motor in a Ferrari.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:24 pm
by DZA
Architecture wrote:why in the hell would you want FL on a mac?!
That makes as much sense as putting a Ford Motor in a Ferrari.
Would merk off a Ferrari
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:30 pm
by Architecture
ok bad example. lol
Ford PINTO engine in a Ferrari is more like it. It looks nice, feels nice, peforms terribly.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:05 am
by wormcode
Yeah my cousin runs it and it works fine on Intel Mac + Bootcamp + XP, and they even provide some Mac support on the forum.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:53 am
by collige
Bootcamp. Parallels. Crossover. Maybe Cider.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:21 pm
by Project_B
Architecture wrote:why in the hell would you want FL on a mac?!
That makes as much sense as putting a Ford Motor in a Ferrari.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:57 pm
by deadly_habit
yea bootcamp
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:10 am
by Architecture
Project_B wrote:
Architecture wrote:why in the hell would you want FL on a mac?!
That makes as much sense as putting a Ford Motor in a Ferrari.
Oh yes i did.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:14 am
by deadly_habit
Architecture wrote:
Project_B wrote:
Architecture wrote:why in the hell would you want FL on a mac?!
That makes as much sense as putting a Ford Motor in a Ferrari.
Oh yes i did.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:22 am
by Architecture
Cmon guys, there much better DAW's out there than FL Studio, I can guarantee it. If your gonna lay down the cash for a Mac you might as well get something a little more worth while than FL.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:24 am
by deadly_habit
Architecture wrote:Cmon guys, there much better DAW's out there than FL Studio, I can guarantee it. If your gonna lay down the cash for a Mac you might as well get something a little more worth while than FL.
the tools don't make a diff
honestly think an amateur on logic can top spor? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdPUNOBViV4
hell concord dawn too
loads of big name producers use fl and reason and such
it's all about what you can do with them
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:26 am
by legend4ry
deadly habit wrote:
Architecture wrote:Cmon guys, there much better DAW's out there than FL Studio, I can guarantee it. If your gonna lay down the cash for a Mac you might as well get something a little more worth while than FL.
the tools don't make a diff
honestly think an amateur on logic can top spor? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdPUNOBViV4
hell concord dawn too
loads of big name producers use fl and reason and such
it's all about what you can do with them
Truth, people forget that 90% of FL users who're over the initial "learning the daw" stage, use 3rd party plugins and have collected their own sample library.
So what, you're saying is "MY DAW SEQUENCERS BETTER AND LOOKS BETTER THAN YOURS?"
Oh okay, thats nice.
FL is immense for Midi but lacks with audio .. I'd go as far as to say FL is the best ive used (on windows) for Midi and you get used to how to use audio with it...
For the record, I am a Cubase user.. I started on FL and still go back to it sometimes for making fast loops or toying with ideas and lay them down solidey in Cubase.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:28 am
by deadly_habit
legend4ry wrote:
deadly habit wrote:
Architecture wrote:Cmon guys, there much better DAW's out there than FL Studio, I can guarantee it. If your gonna lay down the cash for a Mac you might as well get something a little more worth while than FL.
the tools don't make a diff
honestly think an amateur on logic can top spor? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdPUNOBViV4
hell concord dawn too
loads of big name producers use fl and reason and such
it's all about what you can do with them
Truth, people forget that 90% of FL users who're over the initial "learning the daw" stage, use 3rd party plugins and have collected their own sample library.
So what, you're saying is "MY DAW SEQUENCERS BETTER AND LOOKS BETTER THAN YOURS?"
Oh okay, thats nice.
FL is immense for Midi but lacks with audio .. I'd go as far as to say FL is the best ive used (on windows) for Midi.
For the record, I am a Cubase user.. I started on FL.
same but there are plenty stayed fl or reason that kill it
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:30 am
by legend4ry
deadly habit wrote:
legend4ry wrote:
deadly habit wrote:
Architecture wrote:Cmon guys, there much better DAW's out there than FL Studio, I can guarantee it. If your gonna lay down the cash for a Mac you might as well get something a little more worth while than FL.
the tools don't make a diff
honestly think an amateur on logic can top spor? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdPUNOBViV4
hell concord dawn too
loads of big name producers use fl and reason and such
it's all about what you can do with them
Truth, people forget that 90% of FL users who're over the initial "learning the daw" stage, use 3rd party plugins and have collected their own sample library.
So what, you're saying is "MY DAW SEQUENCERS BETTER AND LOOKS BETTER THAN YOURS?"
Oh okay, thats nice.
FL is immense for Midi but lacks with audio .. I'd go as far as to say FL is the best ive used (on windows) for Midi.
For the record, I am a Cubase user.. I started on FL.
same but there are plenty stayed fl or reason that kill it
Indeed I only moved to cubase cause it works better with recording in and Audio, I dont' work much on Midi anymore so its better for my work flow... Otherwise i'd still be on the ol' loopyfruits.
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:33 am
by deadly_habit
legend4ry wrote:
deadly habit wrote:
legend4ry wrote:
deadly habit wrote:
Architecture wrote:Cmon guys, there much better DAW's out there than FL Studio, I can guarantee it. If your gonna lay down the cash for a Mac you might as well get something a little more worth while than FL.
the tools don't make a diff
honestly think an amateur on logic can top spor? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdPUNOBViV4
hell concord dawn too
loads of big name producers use fl and reason and such
it's all about what you can do with them
Truth, people forget that 90% of FL users who're over the initial "learning the daw" stage, use 3rd party plugins and have collected their own sample library.
So what, you're saying is "MY DAW SEQUENCERS BETTER AND LOOKS BETTER THAN YOURS?"
Oh okay, thats nice.
FL is immense for Midi but lacks with audio .. I'd go as far as to say FL is the best ive used (on windows) for Midi.
For the record, I am a Cubase user.. I started on FL.
same but there are plenty stayed fl or reason that kill it
Indeed I only moved to cubase cause it works better with recording in and Audio, I dont' work much on Midi anymore so its better for my work flow... Otherwise i'd still be on the ol' loopyfruits.
same cubase is don of audio
Re: FL on mac... Possible?
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:47 am
by Architecture
FL is pretty much something id only use for midi. seems tight enough to controll all my hardware synths and drum machines.
only thing is I dont get the groove like I do on my MPC.