Mastering a Track
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:40 pm
anyone wanna tell me how to propperly master my track? 

I would second this book, not just from a mastering point of view but also for all things audioangryrancor wrote:Bob Katz is generally accepted to be the definitive source on this issue. Get this:
http://www.amazon.com/Mastering-Audio-S ... b_title_bk
Word just stick an eq to roll off the lows(36hz) and ear-piercing highs, crank a limiter on it, make 300hz and below mono (If you wanna cut to vinyl), add a little bit of stereo width, some harmonic excitement, and Presto!MikkiFunk wrote:Its quite a simple technique really, mastering.
1. Make sure you have a load of headroom on your master output. Then bounce from here as a wav.
2. Go onto 'Google' and look for some mastering engineers. Or find out who master's certain genre's/ who is really the go-to guy (or girl) in mastering dubstep. But generally better to find someone who does a wide range of stuff as they will have more experience >>> skill.
3. Pick someone and said this bounced master of your track to them.
Personally if you just want to play it, stick an adaptive limiter or standard limiter on the master and squash it a bit to 0dB. If you are actually going to release it and make it available to the public then do the done thing and get it mastered properly.
I hate it when people tell me they're 'just mastering a track'. Coz its that easy that every producer would be putting Bob Katz out of business. Lol.
I wouldn't roll off that high...quite a lot of systems can produce that frequency so your gonna be loosing rumble if your tune gets played on a really nice system. Which might not seem likely for any of us here at the moment but it's still a bad practice to get into.therook wrote:Word just stick an eq to roll off the lows(36hz) and ear-piercing highs, crank a limiter on it, make 300hz and below mono (If you wanna cut to vinyl), add a little bit of stereo width, some harmonic excitement, and Presto!
Just be sure to take that crap off when sending it to be mastered.
It's a good book, but I wouldn't say he is generally accepted to be the definitive source on mastering... lots of people have their own ways/disagree with his approach, and a lot of people dislike the book for being too processing-centric. It's a much more musical game than people seem to draw from that book. He knows this, it just gets a bit carried away with the tech stuff and people seem to have latched on to that as being what mastering's all about.lowpass wrote:I would second this book, not just from a mastering point of view but also for all things audioangryrancor wrote:Bob Katz is generally accepted to be the definitive source on this issue. Get this:
http://www.amazon.com/Mastering-Audio-S ... b_title_bk
I guess you're right. Idk I've seen many folks say different things. Some say 20-25, others 30, others 36-40hz (them ol vinyl cutters)paravrais wrote:I wouldn't roll off that high...quite a lot of systems can produce that frequency so your gonna be loosing rumble if your tune gets played on a really nice system. Which might not seem likely for any of us here at the moment but it's still a bad practice to get into.therook wrote:Word just stick an eq to roll off the lows(36hz) and ear-piercing highs, crank a limiter on it, make 300hz and below mono (If you wanna cut to vinyl), add a little bit of stereo width, some harmonic excitement, and Presto!
Just be sure to take that crap off when sending it to be mastered.
Well I usually make very subby music so for me I don't want to risk loosing any of that goodness. To each their own I guess.therook wrote:I guess you're right. Idk I've seen many folks say different things. Some say 20-25, others 30, others 36-40hz (them ol vinyl cutters)paravrais wrote:I wouldn't roll off that high...quite a lot of systems can produce that frequency so your gonna be loosing rumble if your tune gets played on a really nice system. Which might not seem likely for any of us here at the moment but it's still a bad practice to get into.therook wrote:Word just stick an eq to roll off the lows(36hz) and ear-piercing highs, crank a limiter on it, make 300hz and below mono (If you wanna cut to vinyl), add a little bit of stereo width, some harmonic excitement, and Presto!
Just be sure to take that crap off when sending it to be mastered.
Wouldn't less low end rumble = more headroom and space for your mix to breathe? Just a thought. As much as I like feeling that rumble in my crotch I also like to hear whats being played. Last venue I went to I couldn't hear anything but bass and some midrange cack.
Welcome to dubstep in 2011.therook wrote: Last venue I went to I couldn't hear anything but bass and some midrange cack.
macc wrote:Welcome to dubstep in 2011.therook wrote: Last venue I went to I couldn't hear anything but bass and some midrange cack.