Page 1 of 2
Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:09 pm
by joe muggs
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:17 pm
by brasco
big, checking this out now
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:24 pm
by ashley
christ 6000 words. Do you have a TL;DR version?
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:21 pm
by Valarya
really really good read - thanks for posting
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:52 pm
by joe muggs
ashley wrote:christ 6000 words. Do you have a TL;DR version?
Does not compute.
Actually it very specifically bigs up Get Darker

Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:06 pm
by __________
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:27 pm
by Shum
Nice read Joe

Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:36 pm
by Sharmaji
nice round up of the state of things, Joe-- glad to see that, in the end, i think we can all agree that there's endless positive things that will continue to come from our little neck of the subcultural worlds.
And you excellently ducked-and-covered the bro debacle by coining "dudestep."
that, alone, is deserving of dancing corn:

Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:29 pm
by dj klaim
Great read! Fucking LONG tho!
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 10:35 am
by joe muggs
dj klaim wrote:Great read! Fucking LONG tho!
There's a lot to say....
In the old days, people used to write things that are even longer, you couldn't put them on your screeen but they had these individual bits you could flick through to jump from one part to another instantly. They were called "buks" or something.

Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:02 am
by ras-claat
nice read! glad to see this topic being discussed on a serious level with profound arguments!
strong points on both sides!
thx for your effort!

Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 8:37 pm
by polho
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:55 pm
by slanguage
brilliant...nuff said
i'm gonna repost this on my facebook and link as many heads that i know will enjoy reading this as i can
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 10:08 pm
by DannyLifted
nice breakdown indeed
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:23 am
by madmeesh
"it still remains a deep rooted sound, something with real people's real soundystem experiences at its beating heart"

Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:49 pm
by joe muggs
Cheers for the comments, much appreciated.
Also if anyone hasn't seen it, here's another lengthy bit of musing on where genre names come from, with a few familiar folk popping up in it:
http://www.redbullmusicacademy.com/dail ... /17/0/2070
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:18 pm
by youthful_implants
really interesting discussion.

Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:12 pm
by collige
Really fantastic article. I agree with pretty much everything said there. However, I do want to add this:
Dubstep (in America, at least) has an image problem. Speaking from my own experiences and talking to other people, I've realized this: Despite all this great, diverse music being made, to the average person who isn't a fan of a genre, dubstep appears to consist only of WUBWUBWUBWUB tracks and James Blake. Obviously, not everyone is going to like the genre anyway, but due the continuing success of "brostep" artists outside of the genres' regular listeners a lot of people are writing off dubstep as the worst genre ever.
Thoughts?
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:21 pm
by Caski
collige wrote:Really fantastic article. I agree with pretty much everything said there. However, I do want to add this:
Dubstep (in America, at least) has an image problem. Speaking from my own experiences and talking to other people, I've realized this: Despite all this great, diverse music being made, to the average person who isn't a fan of a genre, dubstep appears to consist only of WUBWUBWUBWUB tracks and James Blake. Obviously, not everyone is going to like the genre anyway, but due the continuing success of "brostep" artists outside of the genres' regular listeners a lot of people are writing off dubstep as the worst genre ever.
Thoughts?
they're listening to the wrong shit.
Re: Dubstep & the mainstream - a discussion
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:22 pm
by 64hz
they are fools.
great article, it presents the present genre/scene perfectly imo