Page 1 of 1

OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:21 pm
by buttock
Imageline changed the default Tempo to 130 BPM :o :o :o

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:27 pm
by hasezwei
tbh i never got 120 anyway. i mean even if you go by house and trance being the most popular genres of electronic music it's just too damn slow.

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:27 pm
by DJ Crackle
oh jebus

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:34 pm
by buttock
hasezwei wrote:tbh i never got 120 anyway. i mean even if you go by house and trance being the most popular genres of electronic music it's just too damn slow.
Fruity used to be 140!!! the secret of the Dubstep Swagger. 120 Bpm is in more tradional DAWs where they sometimes record these old fashioned rock'n'roll bands.....

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:42 pm
by alphacat
repost of an earlier reply I made about the 140 dogma:
Lemonlust wrote:I mean, most dubstep songs are 140 bpm. Would it not be considered dubstep if it were a different tempo?
Image

YES.

...I don't believe that dubstep has to be a certain tempo in order to be dubstep. I would say that if it got fast enough it'd often be functionally indistinguishable from DnB, but that's because the two are musical cousins with many shared references including each one to the other (like Loefah saying he started out wanting to make slower, more danceable & vibe-heavy jungle, or the current fad for ½step in DnB.)

When people first started applying the term "dubstep" to the fairly broad continuum of bass-heavy underground sounds coming out there was a wider range of tempos in the music being described. The lowest common denominator was the Bass/Space/Pace formula, but specific ratios of each were pretty wide open back then.

As it coalesced into a more 'stable,' 'defined,' or 'generic' sound (all of these descriptives are true in some measure) then the tyranny of 140 arose from DJ complicity for the same reasons that DJs like house music: it's much easier to mix something that you know is going to follow the same tempo or pattern as the tune that's on deck without thinking ahead. You can just reach in the bag and know that it's all... the same.

I disagree with the earlier statement that when it gets too much slower it becomes downtempo - you can't say that slower stuff by Scorn or Barry Hercules' sounds like downtempo, because it's heavier and not just slower. Downtempo tends to have a different vibe that's more about chillin' and relaxing, while aggressively heavy music does NOT have that effect usually. You could say there's a certain tension that belongs to dubstep that's not a desired goal in much downtempo music...

FIGHT
B.P.M.
FASCISM!


:P: :C:

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:46 pm
by buttock
So finally Imageline set us free :Q: :corndance:

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:47 pm
by hasezwei
buttock wrote:
hasezwei wrote:tbh i never got 120 anyway. i mean even if you go by house and trance being the most popular genres of electronic music it's just too damn slow.
Fruity used to be 140!!! the secret of the Dubstep Swagger. 120 Bpm is in more tradional DAWs where they sometimes record these old fashioned rock'n'roll bands.....
oh i thought they were moving it towards dubstep. so they're moving it AWAY from dubstep? wow, FL really *is* better than i thought ;-)

@alphacat: i thought dubstep was always pretty much 130+ bpm, descending from garage and all. it's just that halftime doesn't work when you go considerably slower than 138, and halftime's become one of the main elements of the sound (sadly).

but who cares about standard tempos in DAWs anyway ? :corntard:

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:50 pm
by buttock
I CARE!!!

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:52 pm
by sketchyderek
Mmmmmm shuffles sound better in the 142 - 144 range, imho.
120-130 is soo sloowwww


need i bring up "moombahcore" lolz :corntard:

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:03 pm
by DJ Crackle
hasezwei wrote:but who cares about standard tempos in DAWs anyway ? :corntard:
inorite
can you not change default bpm in FL?

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:07 pm
by zawmbee
Hopefully they'll let you be able to change the starting tempo speed, if it's not too hard for them of course ¬¬

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:22 pm
by buttock
feature request :6: