Page 1 of 14

Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:00 am
by christophera

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:12 am
by Phigure
Thanks for that, that was REALLY cool

not sure if i believe all of it, but the mathematical stuff was interesting

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:13 am
by christophera
Image






Image








Image

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:23 am
by christophera
of course you don't believe it. it's not on tv. if fox news or cnn was reporting it nobody would question it.

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:25 am
by christophera
the part i think is funny is that this guy thinks he's the first one to figure this out. people have been demonstrating vortex based perpetual energy for a long ass time now.

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:29 am
by collige
christophera wrote:of course you don't believe it. it's not on tv. if fox news or cnn was reporting it nobody would question it.
If anything, I think it being on Fox would make people less likely to believe it.

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:30 am
by christophera
people believe obama has power

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:37 am
by knell
the sound of parson masturbating in this thread is deafening

awesome video tho

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:41 am
by christophera
i bet that's a pretty visual in your mind :P

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:55 am
by christophera
dan winter is on some similar math

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:07 am
by nowaysj
Thank you was looking for that ^

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:25 am
by drokkr
I love this

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:26 am
by nowaysj
christophera wrote:
Can't tell you how many steel balls I've seen spinning in glass bowls over wound toroids, and yet the people making these fantastic claims can't seem to demonstrably generate any electricity...

I don't know what the criteria are for getting tedx status, but obviously some bs is slipping through.

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:53 am
by phrex
very scientific :lol:

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:55 am
by noam
to be fair TED's not just about science its just about expressing new or interesting idea's

otherwise i cant for the life of me work out why Goldie was on there spouting shit about his inner-child....

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:57 am
by phrex
he was high :lol:

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:58 am
by Mr Hyde
vulvavibration wrote:very scientific :lol:
Can't tell you how many steel balls I've seen spinning in glass bowls over wound toroids, and yet the people making these fantastic claims can't seem to demonstrably generate any electricity...

I don't know what the criteria are for getting tedx status, but obviously some bs is slipping through.

yeah. this.

would love to see things like what he claims working, but always seems like wishful thinking, the lectures are all grand ideas without any substantial scientific evidence to back them up.

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:08 am
by DRTY
smoke too much weed
play too much spirograph
make video
?????
profit

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:14 pm
by lloydnoise
can't see the vid cos I'm at work but aren't they all just re-designed transformers and what not? I've seen many of these devices built in sheds or by absolute fuckmuppets like David Sereda and NONE of them actually do anything new.. If they do work, why haven't we re-written the fundemental laws of thermodynamics yet?

Re: Vortex based mathematics

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:10 pm
by noam
lloydnoise wrote:can't see the vid cos I'm at work but aren't they all just re-designed transformers and what not? I've seen many of these devices built in sheds or by absolute fuckmuppets like David Sereda and NONE of them actually do anything new.. If they do work, why haven't we re-written the fundemental laws of thermodynamics yet?
the gub'ment???