LulzSec are fucking ridiculous. I laughed with them before but now i just view them as retards. Great, i could SQL echo back tons of info too, way to go guys... when the government slaps some draconian internet laws on us because of these assholes, i'm sure they'll still be lulzing
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 1:30 am
by wormcode
knell wrote:LulzSec are fucking ridiculous. I laughed with them before but now i just view them as retards. Great, i could SQL echo back tons of info too, way to go guys... when the government slaps some draconian internet laws on us because of these assholes, i'm sure they'll still be lulzing
Yes exactly. It's idiots like this that will "justify" the US gov crippling internet freedom. I'm more interested in them cracking the FBI and US Senate sites recently because this is the kind of stuff the gov will use to push bullshit new bills, just like how they completely used the WTC attacks to introduce shit like the Patriot Act. Removing our freedoms to protect our freedoms, and people just accept it...
They probably don't care because I'm sure they are multinational, and teenagers.
I was rather annoyed when both Minecraft and League of Legends went down. XD
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:04 am
by wormcode
Also what was the point of cracking Bethesda's network, they are one of the few good game devs around. They even mentioned they loved Bethesda but would leak their info+source code anyway.
Fallout Online has had enough delays.
Anyway Interplay runs that now I think.
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:08 am
by collige
I can't tell if these guys are stupid, cocky, or both.
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:13 am
by pkay
wormcode wrote:Also what was the point of cracking Bethesda's network, they are one of the few good game devs around. They even mentioned they loved Bethesda but would leak their info+source code anyway.
Fallout Online has had enough delays.
Anyway Interplay runs that now I think.
fallout online has nothing to do with Bethesda outside them crying about Interplay not making the game the way they want it made.
Inrweplay will soon have the full rights to the fall out series and bethesda will no longer have anything to do with the fallout franchise... not exactly heartbroken over that
on the original topic... its funny none the less.... like ken fighting ryu and people saying one is better than the other
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:22 am
by collige
I suppose I am technically part of Anon now that I think about it...
As for the Fallout thing, I'd much rather Bethesda keep the license because:
-Fallout 3 was awesome and it'd be even more awesome to have Fallout 4 run on the Skyrim engine
-Interplay is broke and doesn't have any idea what the fuck they're doing
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:25 am
by pkay
collige wrote:I suppose I am technically part of Anon now that I think about it...
As for the Fallout thing, I'd much rather Bethesda keep the license because:
-Fallout 3 was awesome and it'd be even more awesome to have Fallout 4 run on the Skyrim engine
-Interplay is broke and doesn't have any idea what the fuck they're doing
Fallout 3 was nowhere near the game the original 2 or tactics was story wise.
I dunno Bethesda games are boring to me. Fallout was just like Elder Scroll series with different skins and a weak story
Kinda why Rockstar is turning to shit for me.... GTA 3 on... same game.... red dead redemption turned in to Grand theft horses.... and LA noire, while novel art wise, was just a half assed bioware game
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:33 am
by collige
Even if you don't like the new Fallouts (haven't played New Vegas yet, so I can't comment on the story for that), I still think it's better overall to have some games published by Bethesda rather than no games published by Interplay.
But to stay on topic:
Lulzsec are going to get themselves into some deep shit and I will not be dismayed when they do.
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:12 am
by Shum
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:25 am
by tacospheros
to be honest , the whole thing reeks of cia/disinfo/cointelpro type shit
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:26 am
by tacospheros
they both have twitter accounts ? the fuck outta here ...
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:28 am
by kidshuffle
next thing you know, they'll both be full fledged corporations.
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:50 am
by deadly_habit
lulzsec is why encylopediadramatica changed domains
they are a fringe bunch of tools who just ddos shit
not a hacker group
that being said they are amusing with bs they target
this has dick to do with 4chan anyways
4chan raids are so poor anyways
lulzsec goal atm seems to just be prevalent and a thorn in gaming sites and isp side. sony was first, xbox and microsoft best brace
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:54 am
by knell
tacospheros wrote:to be honest , the whole thing reeks of cia/disinfo/cointelpro type shit
that was my gut reaction too... would have to be a sponsorship tho, they reference jokes that i havent heard since '05. plus they do stupid shit like release passwords/emails, they're pretty reckless.
also they recently shut down the cia's website, too
