New Zomby interview
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:56 pm
you are relentlessincnic wrote:
love burial interviews
thanks!
made meI ask if he enjoyed the video for Chase and Status’ ‘Blind Faith’..........He looks up from his iPhone as though he’s been slapped in the face
He works fastI’ll write 70 or 100 tunes in a week — all the Where Were U In ’92? tracks were written in one weekend.
Very impressive indeed, but we also have to take into consideration that the majority of the tunes he makes are very, very short.Dub_freak wrote:He works fastI’ll write 70 or 100 tunes in a week — all the Where Were U In ’92? tracks were written in one weekend.
I get the impression he'd make a good writer too, though it doesn't seem like he'd have the attention span or the interest.If you don’t have a soul in the first place, you can’t even get an audience with the devil
You also have to take into consideration the fact that most 4 minute+ tunes just repeat 2 minutes worth of datavishes wrote:Very impressive indeed, but we also have to take into consideration that the majority of the tunes he makes are very, very short.Dub_freak wrote:He works fastI’ll write 70 or 100 tunes in a week — all the Where Were U In ’92? tracks were written in one weekend.
As they say in that interview, only Natalia's Song is over 4 minutes, just 2 others are over 3 minutes long and the rest is even shorter...
You also have to take into consideration he could be full of shit.fractal wrote:You also have to take into consideration the fact that most 4 minute+ tunes just repeat 2 minutes worth of datavishes wrote:Very impressive indeed, but we also have to take into consideration that the majority of the tunes he makes are very, very short.Dub_freak wrote:He works fastI’ll write 70 or 100 tunes in a week — all the Where Were U In ’92? tracks were written in one weekend.
As they say in that interview, only Natalia's Song is over 4 minutes, just 2 others are over 3 minutes long and the rest is even shorter...

I always work under the assumption that all of us arecraig wrote:You also have to take into consideration he could be full of shit.fractal wrote:You also have to take into consideration the fact that most 4 minute+ tunes just repeat 2 minutes worth of datavishes wrote:Very impressive indeed, but we also have to take into consideration that the majority of the tunes he makes are very, very short.Dub_freak wrote:He works fastI’ll write 70 or 100 tunes in a week — all the Where Were U In ’92? tracks were written in one weekend.
As they say in that interview, only Natalia's Song is over 4 minutes, just 2 others are over 3 minutes long and the rest is even shorter...
oh no not at all... im just talking from a logistics standpoint its not some outlandish claimfractal wrote:^agreed, but is the amount of work put into something directly equivalent to the amount of pleasure that something can give to its audience? is a song that took longer to produce better just because of the amount of time put into it?
[
Haha, yes, can't argue about that.fractal wrote:You also have to take into consideration the fact that most 4 minute+ tunes just repeat 2 minutes worth of datavishes wrote:Very impressive indeed, but we also have to take into consideration that the majority of the tunes he makes are very, very short.Dub_freak wrote:He works fastI’ll write 70 or 100 tunes in a week — all the Where Were U In ’92? tracks were written in one weekend.
As they say in that interview, only Natalia's Song is over 4 minutes, just 2 others are over 3 minutes long and the rest is even shorter...