Page 1 of 2
Digital release quality
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:08 am
by nerdyluke
Hi,
I'm willing to buy the Urban Ethics LP in flac or wav for best quality, and I found a couple sites like
http://boomkat.com/downloads/409802-coki-urban-ethics ,
http://www.beatport.com/release/urban-ethics/371493 and
http://www.digital-tunes.net/releases/urban_ethics . Now I thought I'd just go digital-tunes since they're the cheapest, but I found
this so I'm a bit hesitant here :s I know I'm being a bit picky on this one but I'd like to be sure I get what I pay for.
Has any of you bought this LP in flac or wav on these sites or another and can vouch for the quality of the release?
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:21 am
by Cybertrash
Beatport's pretty legit, only one I've had experience with.
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:27 am
by Soulstep
The shops get there music off the distributors, if it sounds bad in one shop it will sound bad in all of them (probably)
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:31 pm
by 1point5
Sound quality on download stores' streaming preview is always low to make you have to buy the record for full quality, the actual quality of the downloaded file afterwards should be just as good from any of them. My personal favourite for digital releases is Juno Download
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:17 pm
by Osario
i've bought from digital tunes many a time, great store. the only time i had an issue was with sp:mc & lx one - hunted, but that was the same with every download store
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:30 pm
by nerdyluke
roight thanks guys now I feel a bit more confident buying on digital-tunes

Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:41 am
by Raggles
I'm sure most sites would give you a refund if you weren't satisfied with the quality.
Not sure about beatport as far as customer service but the files i've gotten from them are as good as anything else.
WAV all DAY
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:17 am
by incnic
beatport are really bad what an evil company
i ahte their site and i dont think they are even british?
always buy boomkat
i heard a rumour that beatport run all teh tunes through a online limiter to squash the msuic to teh same volume...
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:04 am
by xana
Beatport has always been my go to site. you can choose the download quality too usually
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:32 am
by Terpit
incnic wrote:beatport are really bad what an evil company
i ahte their site and i dont think they are even british?
always buy boomkat
i heard a rumour that beatport run all teh tunes through a online limiter to squash the msuic to teh same volume...
You hate them because you heard a rumour? I find Beatport much easier to use and I had a very quick polite response when I had a problem (I closed the downloading program when it wasn't finished

)
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:52 am
by Func
Beatport are way too expensive. You know something is wrong when it's cheaper to buy the vinyl release than the digital.
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 4:00 pm
by Soulstep
incnic wrote:beatport are really bad what an evil company
prices are extortion
but they give labels a much better % than juno
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 4:03 pm
by Terpit
Not come across any other site that sells AIFF files unfortunately
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 4:36 pm
by syrup
fuck beatport
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:02 pm
by 1point5
Beatport probably does look the nicest/have the best preview player of the main download stores... but they are a bit expensive and the genre categories are very US-centric. There also seems to be a ridiculous amount of tracks listed under the wrong genres.
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:56 am
by scspkr99
Terpit wrote:Not come across any other site that sells AIFF files unfortunately
If you buy AIFF FLAC ALAC or WAV you have the uncompressed file changing the codec through a converter like XLD results in a bit perfect replica of the original.
Beatport charge an extra £1 for WAV per track it's a fucking scandal when Boomkat charge $2 per album and Juno I think charges the same price.
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:00 am
by nerdyluke
scspkr99 wrote:Beatport charge an extra £1 for WAV per track it's a fucking scandal when Boomkat charge $2 per album and Juno I think charges the same price.
ya even digital-tunes sells wav/flac/320 for the same price, but it seems beatport have a bit more choice than d-t
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:02 am
by Terpit
AIFF files are tagged correctly, you cant edit WAV files (or at least i dont know how to). having AIFFs makes things so much easier to navigate when using serato coz it already has artist, label etc
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:13 am
by Pistonsbeneath
Digital-tunes waves of 24th century ep were the same as everywhere else and its surely the same for everyone
often people just dont spend the money to get them to sound right
Re: Digital release quality
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:21 am
by nerdyluke
Terpit wrote:AIFF files are tagged correctly, you cant edit WAV files (or at least i dont know how to). having AIFFs makes things so much easier to navigate when using serato coz it already has artist, label etc
I just use foobar to tag my files (works with wav or any other format).