12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:12 pm
FIRST!
Page 1 of 2
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:13 pm
GMT or fuck off
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:14 pm
wut u going 2 do the 2nd time around
unless like my watch which is stuck in military time
unless like my watch which is stuck in military time
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:18 pm
My watch always reads party:time
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:19 pm
Country of origin?Molzie wrote:
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:29 pm
southstar wrote:GMT or fuck off
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:08 am
im now 22 years of age 
russia, always russia.nowaysj wrote:Country of origin?Molzie wrote:
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:36 am
technically, it's not "12:12" until 12 minutes passed 12 PM - i.e. 12 hours and 12 minutes, not 0 hours and 12 minutesEDIT: i just saw you're in NZ
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:40 am
You could theoretically extend that into 12 seconds past, 12 ms past, 0.12 past, etc. ad infinitum...pulsar wrote:
The infinite now.
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:46 am
pulsar wrote:
EDIT: i just saw you're in NZ
I even counted to twelve in my head before hitting submit.
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:47 am
i guess you could. if you could click "submit" fast enough, then you'd look really coolalphacat wrote:You could theoretically extend that into 12 seconds past, 12 ms past, 0.12 past, etc. ad infinitum...pulsar wrote:
The infinite now.
stephen hawking told me that time isn't even lyk dat anyway doe
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:00 am
out to you Molzie, original DSF "Twelver"Molzie wrote:pulsar wrote:
EDIT: i just saw you're in NZ
I even counted to twelve in my head before hitting submit.
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:25 am
FWIW this idea of measurement extending infinitely inwards is one of Zeno's Paradoxes.pulsar wrote:i guess you could. if you could click "submit" fast enough, then you'd look really coolalphacat wrote:You could theoretically extend that into 12 seconds past, 12 ms past, 0.12 past, etc. ad infinitum...pulsar wrote:
The infinite now.
stephen hawking told me that time isn't even lyk dat anyway doe
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 4:00 am
That old world did end.
Watch for subtle changes at first.
Watch for subtle changes at first.
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:48 am
subtle change: sd5 back.
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:50 am
sd5 wrote:That old world did end.
Watch for subtle changes at first.
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:01 am
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-575 ... et-launch/
Awesome, what do you say they launch the real one on the 21st?
Awesome, what do you say they launch the real one on the 21st?
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:15 pm
and now everyone in the UK is posting this shit on fb
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:18 pm
Its a fake anyway, the real one happened 800 years ago
Re: 12:12 12/12/12
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:23 pm
i thought the real one was happening in 300 years?
because its actually only 1730ish?
because its actually only 1730ish?