Page 1 of 2
unknown / improper trax
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:01 pm
by icecoldchrissy
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:54 pm
by incnic

i dont really understand whats going on
ny1 got a 128kpbs rip for a mix im doing.
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:26 am
by Func
They released this
http://www.discogs.com/FCL-Its-You/release/3831037 and only pressed up 150 copies and so there ended up being high demand just for rips.
It got bootleged and boomkat are selling the bootleg.
Label head threatens to get ghetto on anyone buying, selling or playing the bootleg.
TBH I'm glad this is happening, too much labels do half assed pressings. If you're not gonna properly press and distribute it why release it
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 2:19 am
by incnic
its ok i just got a rip from what.cd
:bashme:
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:09 am
by atlascesar
there is understanding why the first record with only 2500 pressings is a good one. it has the feelings and the emotions like the favorite movies on warm days, running through sprinklers, golden showers of joy when there is a party. maybe there are good things coming all over soon when there is more chances to buy it too
but there are also previews for listening at the booming cat store and the trouble record that is ILLEGAL SOUNDS LIKE the bad trashcans not the good ones. i have hopes and there will be good decisions for the friends who AVOID THE bad copy records because it is not so much good for the party and the showers are WORSE! and this is my opinions
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:27 am
by webstep
Func wrote:TBH I'm glad this is happening, too much labels do half assed pressings. If you're not gonna properly press and distribute it why release it
Its completely up to the label how many copies they want to press, it wasn't "half assed" it was planned to be limited from the get-go. There's not some law were music has to be distributed to the masses.
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:27 pm
by Func
webstep wrote:Func wrote:TBH I'm glad this is happening, too much labels do half assed pressings. If you're not gonna properly press and distribute it why release it
Its completely up to the label how many copies they want to press, it wasn't "half assed" it was planned to be limited from the get-go. There's not some law were music has to be distributed to the masses.
You can still do 300 copies and have it limited too. IMO it is half assed, what's the point of doing a vinyl only press if you're not going to be dedicated and do it properly by pressing up a decent amount of copies.
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:24 am
by wub
atlascesar wrote:but there are also previews for listening at the booming cat store and the trouble record that is ILLEGAL SOUNDS LIKE the bad trashcans not the good ones. i have hopes and there will be good decisions for the friends who AVOID THE bad copy records because it is not so much good for the party and the showers are WORSE! and this is my opinions
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:07 am
by gwa
I've got a couple of bootys due to not wanting to pay excruciating amounts for the original
meh
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:09 pm
by Raad
Func wrote:They released this
http://www.discogs.com/FCL-Its-You/release/3831037 and only pressed up 150 copies and so there ended up being high demand just for rips.
It got bootleged and boomkat are selling the bootleg.
Label head threatens to get ghetto on anyone buying, selling or playing the bootleg.
TBH I'm glad this is happening, too much labels do half assed pressings. If you're not gonna properly press and distribute it why release it
It's not really a bootleg I think but a rework of that San Soda remix. TBH I don't really get the hype over that limited release. That rework is superior imo.
In stock here if anyone wants it:
http://www.chemical-records.co.uk/sc/se ... ck=IMP001B
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:19 pm
by nakedlunch
I don't even like it , but I got 2 bootlegs and I'm playing one out and selling the other on discogs ,come at me bro.
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:34 pm
by Blueshiva
Damn the improper trax version sounds so cheap, joy orbison dropped the san soda version on a funktion one soundsystem, sounded very special
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:06 pm
by solo strike
Improper version sounds fine to me, pretty basic edit with the vocals on top. If someone pressed up the original I wouldn't be complaining
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:18 pm
by Blueshiva
They will soon release it digitally, no need to buy ignorant rip offs...
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:16 am
by nakedlunch
Blueshiva wrote:They will soon release it digitally, no need to buy ignorant rip offs...
I think most people, like me , bought it assuming it was legit , I honestly just bought it to make some extra cash on it by re-selling it.
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:42 am
by Raad
Blueshiva wrote:They will soon release it digitally, no need to buy ignorant rip offs...
lol, by the same argument that San Soda remix is an "ignorant rip off" of E.S.P. - It's You
I guess I'm totally biased since I find that whole european elitist house scene extremely distasteful and boring.
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:26 pm
by Blueshiva
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:38 pm
by Func
lol at the shots being thrown at Jackmaster
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:31 pm
by skimpi
I know its a tool and that, but this is pretty boring to me, dont know why everyone is hyping it up
Re: unknown / improper trax
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:42 pm
by helix
lol this was literally made for fun, then san soda started crying
so it got pressed just to piss him off
