Page 1 of 2
Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:29 am
by Devilsindub
My name is Comprodox and I produce dubstep under the name d.i.d with a really good friend of mine. I'm slightly curious as to why it seems that most dubstep producers tend to associate fl studio users with amateur artists? Can anyone please shed some light on this subject for me? It would be highly appreciated.
-thanks
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:49 am
by __________
It's not "most dubstep producers" who hate on FL. Most dubstep producers have used, or still use FL.
FL's bad rep is a left-over from when it genuinely wasn't a proper DAW, back in versions 1 to 5 ish. It has gradually evolved in to being a proper DAW.
I'd guess at least 35%, if not 50% of early dubstep was made in FL. Old versions of Reason are probably responsible for a slightly smaller but still significant percentage.
Skream, Benga, Kromestar, Heny G, Lost, Silkie, Cessman, JazzyJazzy/J.Tijn, etc etc etc. Bare brostep producers. Many people rock it.
If you built the exact same track in FL and Reaper (for instance) using only VST and VSTi plugins (no program-specific stock/in-built processing) then bounce both tunes at the exact same level, the waveforms will be identical.
In this day and age, the only differences between DAWs are their workflow and stock/built-in plugins and routing, e.g the mixer. This is what will actually impact you; not sound quality (even if it was an issue - which it's not)
People who diss FL probably do so because they don't like it's layout or workflow. This is the only valid reason for dissing any DAW.
edit: this thread should be in the 'production' section btw
fuck reason's sequencer
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:10 am
by forbidden
£10 Bag wrote:FL's bad rep is a left-over from when it genuinely wasn't a proper DAW, back in versions 1 to 5 ish.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:16 am
by GregoryTJ
£10 Bag wrote:
If you built the exact same track in FL and Reaper (for instance) using only VST and VSTi plugins (no program-specific stock/in-built processing) then bounce both tunes at the exact same level, the waveforms will be identical.
Mostly true although randomizing inside of the vsts (phase probably) and slight differences in interpolation/dithering algorithms will lead to different waveforms from each DAW. Just pointing out completely useless facts.
Also the panning laws might be different.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:10 am
by Electric_Head
It's probably because most ppl are assumed to be cracking it.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:59 am
by didi
Electric_Head wrote:It's probably because most ppl are assumed to be cracking it.
that's a gd point
it's not really the daw it's the perceived average user that gives fl the "bad rap"
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:17 pm
by test_recordings
I personally just don't like it, but it is still perfectly functional.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 1:39 pm
by Devilsindub
All these replies make sense. Thanks for clearing that up. Fl studio is a pretty reliable DAW for me, so that was a nagging question in my mind.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 4:51 pm
by MUT3
I personally dont like having to map things to the mixer.
On top of that, i dont know how to duplicate a synth and a mixer channel at the same time. AFAIK you have to save the mixer channel then load it on the next one. Whereas in logic you only have to press "command + D"
So simple workflow things like that are the reason im not into FL.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:12 pm
by Devilsindub
That makes sense mut3. I started with fl many many years ago so I'm probably just used to doing the extra work.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:16 pm
by Devilsindub
Oh and thanks for the heads up £10 Bag! I'm new to the forum so I'm not sure where to properly post stuff yet.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:44 pm
by ineffable
FL being called "Fruity Loops" seems to piss people off too, its kinda silly.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:25 pm
by Gewze
i like fruity loops. nothing wrong with being fruity you prudes
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:34 pm
by TopManLurka
read an interview with nero saying they still use fl.
/
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:17 pm
by Devilsindub
You guys can check our tracks at [bandcamp][/bandcamp]/devilsindub. Not sure how to upload the tracks directly to the forum yet. Can anyone help with that?
-Comprodox
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:37 pm
by antipode
If it's good enough for Wen and Commodo it's good enough for me!
ParasiTTe wrote:FL being called "Fruity Loops" seems to piss people off too, its kinda silly.
Hasn't been called Fruity Loops for years.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:33 am
by Electric_Head
Devilsindub wrote:You guys can check our tracks at

. Not sure how to upload the tracks directly to the forum yet. Can anyone help with that?
-Comprodox
You created this thread just to big up your tunes?
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:32 am
by Harkat
epochalypso wrote:If it's good enough for Wen and Commodo it's good enough for me!
ParasiTTe wrote:FL being called "Fruity Loops" seems to piss people off too, its kinda silly.
Hasn't been called Fruity Loops for years.
Haha, is that like Kitchen Fresh Chicken then?
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 1:45 pm
by Devilsindub
I'm pretty much new so I don't even know what the hell a big up is. I wanted to show a valid example of what fl is capable of and what I was able to create with it. Not trying to spam anyone.
Re: Fl studio, why the bad rap?
Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 1:49 pm
by Electric_Head
Just realize that this is a production forum.
What give you the idea none of us know what FL can do.
Epoch listed Wen and Commodo above.