'pseudo' philosophy from real artsy fella
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 3:23 pm
well, kinda
these are long
"If scientists claim we are animals in the most literal sense, then why are millions of animals experimented with in the most destructive and cruel ways? If taking out someone's eyes against their will just to see how they behave blind is wrong, why is it right to do to other animals? Or is survival of the fittest the justification for that? Scientists gawk at creationists who believe we are above animals, and though creationists are typically the ones through history who wouldn't dare condone such horrid things, the evolutionists are the ones who should feel the most condemned based on their beliefs.. Seems kinda hypocritical. If an animal doesn't have a soul I would think it's life should be all the more respected, but Idk, maybe I'm wrong.."
"I believe science today must address the mysteries of the universe in a manner that is more respectful and neutral rather than assuming of opposition to the ideologies of religion, and visa versa. For years scientific inquiry was rejected by the church, who said man was made in gods image, as we clearly are an incredibly advanced species. Understandably, this spiritual perspective was opposed as Darwin and other great thinkers came to reject it from scientific inquiry, thinking our greatness came from a slow process of natural selection. Science made a point not to be too superstitious, but rational, to seek knowledge with only the five senses by which we live. Which is why scientists can only claim we are one with nature and the animals.
But what my question is to either side, with our consciousness in all its' complexity, and our intellect in all it's excellence, if we are animals to the scientists or gods to the creationists, how is it that our capacity for hypocrisy and evil seems to have no bounds? In the era of Darwin, for the first time, millions of animals were assailed by a frenzy of cruel and unusual experimentation. Mans new religion became science, and we sought to find evidence of ourselves in the behavior of animals. Our excuse for practicing this torture? An opposing statement towards creationists- "Animals don't have souls". Ironic how the first time we identified ourselves with the animals, the animals suffered greatly. To conclude my rant, It would be nice once again to address our responsibility to be moral. Once more we should revolt and stop excessive sacrificial torture for this worship for knowledge done by the popes in lab coats. Because If an animal doesn't have a soul, I would think it's life should be all the more respected."
"Since the ancient physics and chemistry of both time and space, to be broken down for an element is not necessarily to be reduced. Infact, nothing can be destroyed. Therefore, chain-reactively speaking, as inhabitants we share a prolonged ability that allows all things to be recycled, and thus new things to be easily made. It's a universal, paradoxical law shared in various mediums of passage where different types of energies are exchanged, but not reduced.
1: How as children we osmoticly create new words at our liking, as well as all words we have ever created as language. 2: How so effortlessly a bicycle glides through gravity at the graceful wings of inertia, and 3: the commonly shared, more or less understood phenomenon of déjà vu.
Take a walk outside at night, look at a star, any star, and take advantage of your originality. You are as powerful as a wizard. A universal creature. The universal creature, the one and only you. So go forth, young cosmonaut. Go forth and win the battle of your life. For it is for your life, and against those who wish to rule it in which you fight. Create new swords, devise new plans, diversify your techniques, and always, always, believe."
"We aren't always perfect, but we do always feel. Our feelings aren't always good, but they are always real. Reality doesn't apologize nor forgive, thats why it's fair. Everything and everyone is too rare to compare. Opportunity never knocks, it cares not if you're aware. So if you fail to seize it, it'll be you who feels despair. But let that feeling pass. Its in the past, so leave it there. For this world is built to turn, and it doesn't need repair."
any thoughts?
these are long
"If scientists claim we are animals in the most literal sense, then why are millions of animals experimented with in the most destructive and cruel ways? If taking out someone's eyes against their will just to see how they behave blind is wrong, why is it right to do to other animals? Or is survival of the fittest the justification for that? Scientists gawk at creationists who believe we are above animals, and though creationists are typically the ones through history who wouldn't dare condone such horrid things, the evolutionists are the ones who should feel the most condemned based on their beliefs.. Seems kinda hypocritical. If an animal doesn't have a soul I would think it's life should be all the more respected, but Idk, maybe I'm wrong.."
"I believe science today must address the mysteries of the universe in a manner that is more respectful and neutral rather than assuming of opposition to the ideologies of religion, and visa versa. For years scientific inquiry was rejected by the church, who said man was made in gods image, as we clearly are an incredibly advanced species. Understandably, this spiritual perspective was opposed as Darwin and other great thinkers came to reject it from scientific inquiry, thinking our greatness came from a slow process of natural selection. Science made a point not to be too superstitious, but rational, to seek knowledge with only the five senses by which we live. Which is why scientists can only claim we are one with nature and the animals.
But what my question is to either side, with our consciousness in all its' complexity, and our intellect in all it's excellence, if we are animals to the scientists or gods to the creationists, how is it that our capacity for hypocrisy and evil seems to have no bounds? In the era of Darwin, for the first time, millions of animals were assailed by a frenzy of cruel and unusual experimentation. Mans new religion became science, and we sought to find evidence of ourselves in the behavior of animals. Our excuse for practicing this torture? An opposing statement towards creationists- "Animals don't have souls". Ironic how the first time we identified ourselves with the animals, the animals suffered greatly. To conclude my rant, It would be nice once again to address our responsibility to be moral. Once more we should revolt and stop excessive sacrificial torture for this worship for knowledge done by the popes in lab coats. Because If an animal doesn't have a soul, I would think it's life should be all the more respected."
"Since the ancient physics and chemistry of both time and space, to be broken down for an element is not necessarily to be reduced. Infact, nothing can be destroyed. Therefore, chain-reactively speaking, as inhabitants we share a prolonged ability that allows all things to be recycled, and thus new things to be easily made. It's a universal, paradoxical law shared in various mediums of passage where different types of energies are exchanged, but not reduced.
1: How as children we osmoticly create new words at our liking, as well as all words we have ever created as language. 2: How so effortlessly a bicycle glides through gravity at the graceful wings of inertia, and 3: the commonly shared, more or less understood phenomenon of déjà vu.
Take a walk outside at night, look at a star, any star, and take advantage of your originality. You are as powerful as a wizard. A universal creature. The universal creature, the one and only you. So go forth, young cosmonaut. Go forth and win the battle of your life. For it is for your life, and against those who wish to rule it in which you fight. Create new swords, devise new plans, diversify your techniques, and always, always, believe."
"We aren't always perfect, but we do always feel. Our feelings aren't always good, but they are always real. Reality doesn't apologize nor forgive, thats why it's fair. Everything and everyone is too rare to compare. Opportunity never knocks, it cares not if you're aware. So if you fail to seize it, it'll be you who feels despair. But let that feeling pass. Its in the past, so leave it there. For this world is built to turn, and it doesn't need repair."
any thoughts?
