Page 1 of 2

To you, is there a difference between a track and a song?

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:22 pm
by Gewze
As the title

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:27 pm
by OGLemon
not really

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:33 pm
by Liam92
Image

Image

?

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:35 pm
by Harkat
In terms of meaning of the words? Sure. Instrumental tunes aren't "songs".

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:38 pm
by ezza
what he said, tune is like no lyrics for the lads

dont finger gal to a tune lol

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:39 pm
by rickyarbino
Songs need singers who are singing them.
That being said, I use the terms interchangeably in common speech.

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:10 am
by skimpi
yeah songs need to be sung and tracks need to be PULLED UP SELECTA!

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:11 am
by kidshuffle
a track has dub on it

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:19 am
by dickman69
Song lyrics

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:38 am
by syrup
song has songers in it, a track doesn't

song can be a track, but a track can't be a song

:miyagi:

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:00 am
by jaydot
Yeah does my nut in a bit when people refer to most dubstep as songs

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:14 am
by rickyarbino
johney wrote:song has songers in it, a track doesn't

song can be a track, but a track can't be a song

:miyagi:
Pretty sure a track is just a body of information that can be interpreted as audio tbf.

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:22 am
by Phigure
tracks if its a dance music tune or something you could expect a dj to play out

song if its more along the lines of shit a band would play

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:38 am
by hubb
a song has a,b and c parts

a track has bars in equal measures

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:16 am
by BonerJams04
youre a hipster tnuc if you give a shit about a distinction between the two

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:30 am
by rickyarbino
The fuck you making music for if you don't give a fuck about music man?

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:45 am
by BonerJams04
lol cmon mane. it just seems arbitrary to me.

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:00 am
by mks
Man, tracks have 16 bars of intro and songs only have 2.

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:05 am
by didi
johney wrote:a song needs singers

song is always a track, but a track isn't necessarily a song
fixt

Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:11 am
by AxeD
Just put a donk on it.