Dubstepforum.com

what happened to parson? he said interesting stuff,

sure, but more than 75% of that thread was just trashing and name calling. there's dozens of threads on illuminati/ufo's/masons/hollywood. some of them are really really good too. use the search button.

it's just a shame that this one went as far as it did.

we don't moderate the SNH, until issues are brought to our attention, as was the case with the locked thread in question.

if you want to start another thread about it, please do.

any money this will get locked?

Big up yourself wobbleman. That thread was good.

I don't think the moderators can see what goes on behind the scenes in PMs. It's like the secret machinations of government. Means that those that resort to childish tactics get away with harassing and provoking individuals and then making out in public like they are all innocent when people get pissed off. Cheap.

But the mods are only human. I think....

I don't mean to criticise anyone or any decisions made there - it's a dirty job but someone's gotta do it.

BTW, theres only one admin. And thats seckle, so you might as well call him directly.

eh so i'm not completely gone yet sue me

seckle's spin on his behavior in this thread is pathetic.

anybody with two eyes saw what went down and that kind of shit doesn't need to be said about how the thread was locked when it was brought to his attention. when it was brought to his attention he said he was going to allow it. he said i should get used to being mocked and that if i retaliate i was going to be silenced.

masstronaut wrote:Big up yourself wobbleman. That thread was good.

I don't think the moderators can see what goes on behind the scenes in PMs. It's like the secret machinations of government. Means that those that resort to childish tactics get away with harassing and provoking individuals and then making out in public like they are all innocent when people get pissed off. Cheap.

But the mods are only human. I think....

I don't mean to criticise anyone or any decisions made there - it's a dirty job but someone's gotta do it.

It's more just about the fact that this sub-forum is a place where people should come in chill out, laugh and talk about what they want (within reason obviously). most of the time people can be respectful.

we try our best not to get involved with any thread in here , and if you think about it we rarely rarely do.

anyways, enough from me. this forum is run by poax, pk and grand, and big up to them.

seckle's moderation has been called into question numerous times over the years. once he even admitted to it and stepped down. now he's back at it all over again.

everybody says he's the nicest guy in person but as a moderator he's complete shit.

maybe seckle is in the illuminati, are you seckle? lol, i dont think parson was giving anyone abuse or anything bad atall, he was just defending comments made about him or the subject in a rationale and logical way. parson seems patinate about what he says, ive seen far worse things said by people that havent been modertaed, including stupid things ive said, lol

Thanks for the comments.

you're quite welcome.

what i'm interested to know is how you would all interact with each other in person if the occasion arose?

all this chit chat seems to have been elevated by the fact that it's occurred in cyberspace and not in reality.

when people mock me aggressively in person i respond aggressively.

most people have the good sense not to behave that way in person though so the occasion doesn't arise often.

whats the need in quitting the forum over what seckle said? what makes him such a bad admin (not MODERATOR) and what sparked all these arguments on the 16 page topic?

the need in quitting the forum over seckle's comments is because i have been told that my beliefs are open for mockery and that if i don't like it i can fuck myself because they'll ban me.

Parson wrote:the need in quitting the forum over seckle's comments is because i have been told that my beliefs are open for mockery and that if i don't like it i can fuck myself because they'll ban me.

Thats kinda deep. What made seckle say that though? Just out of the blue did he say it?

haha, thats not exactly what he said is it.

what made him say that is the thread was called into question and upon review, he saw nothing for me to be misbehaving over and threatened to ban.

Bob Crunkhouse wrote:haha, thats not exactly what he said is it.

so you are saying that i was not told that my beliefs were ok to mock and that if i continued to retaliate that i would get banned?

are you saying this did not happen?

boo hoo