Dubstepforum.com

2 questions ..


1. How can i put automation on my lfo speed with the sync option on ? (and control it with my macro control later on)

2. How do i put the glide mode on in massive.. i've seen it at the osc tab but i dont know how to put it on.

thanks in advance

1. How can i put automation on my lfo speed with the sync option on ?
You can't do that inside of Massive. You have to do it in your host program.

2. How do i put the glide mode on in massive.. i've seen it at the osc tab but i dont know how to put it on.
You have to be in monophonic mode in the voicing panel, then you just turn on the glide knob.

you cant automate things who are in the tab lfo tabs.. so i have to link it to a macro somehow i think

so daft tnuc you can automate sync rate in host like cubase as i tried this and failed couldnt find it in cubase automation tab?

what blaze said

you cant automate the LFO in a host either, unless you are unsynced.

thesynthesist wrote:you cant automate the LFO in a host either, unless you are unsynced.

i hope NI implement this feature in a future update.

blaze wrote:

thesynthesist wrote:you cant automate the LFO in a host either, unless you are unsynced.

i hope NI implement this feature in a future update.

Yeah you either have to get very precise when automating your LFO unsyncd or create another instance just get a different rate on your bass

i think i gonna email NI soon to ask how we can automate the synced lfo

surley it wouldnt be that hard for NI to add this feature.

Roqqert wrote:i think i gonna email NI soon to ask how we can automate the synced lfo

Dont bother, you cant automate it.

ive said it before, get enough people talking about it here, and I will show NI, but unless there is a large showing of people who want this changed, it wont happen.

So far, there are no plans to change this, i can tell you with certainty.

damnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn... =( ... well then we duplicate the channels hahaha

whoops

thesynthesist wrote:

thesynthesist wrote:

Roqqert wrote:i think i gonna email NI soon to ask how we can automate the synced lfo

Dont bother, you cant automate it.

ive said it before, get enough people talking about it here, and I will show NI, but unless there is a large showing of people who want this changed, it wont happen.

but for now there are no plans to change this, i can tell you with certainty.

I'm a long time user of Massive and I'd like it to be known that I want this changed. It's unbelievable that the LFO's can only be synced OR automated. Same with the Performer and Steppers. There's workarounds, sure, but they're such a waste of resources in what's already a CPU-heavy synth. And to be honest, I'd call it the biggest flaw in an almost perfect all-rounder synth.

Will that do?

That is perfect, anyone else have more to add? Seriously, this will get forwarded...

co-signed.


We want sync'd automation massive ! let it be known

Auan wrote:

thesynthesist wrote:

thesynthesist wrote:

Roqqert wrote:i think i gonna email NI soon to ask how we can automate the synced lfo

Dont bother, you cant automate it.

ive said it before, get enough people talking about it here, and I will show NI, but unless there is a large showing of people who want this changed, it wont happen.

but for now there are no plans to change this, i can tell you with certainty.

I'm a long time user of Massive and I'd like it to be known that I want this changed. It's unbelievable that the LFO's can only be synced OR automated. Same with the Performer and Steppers. There's workarounds, sure, but they're such a waste of resources in what's already a CPU-heavy synth. And to be honest, I'd call it the biggest flaw in an almost perfect all-rounder synth.

Will that do?

took the words right out of my mouth.

yeh its a pain in the arse

Just to confirm my answer about automating in the host program was shit (long time i didn't make any music... sorry about the wrong input).
Anyway, I don't see the problem about having several instances running at different lfo speed although that's pretty unfair from NI to have not implemented such basic function in v1.

Daft tnuc wrote:I don't see the problem about having several instances running at different lfo speed

several instances of massive? u'll need some industry computer for that

I'd rather stick to some other synth