Dubstepforum.com

Whats this?

Brutal Traxx wrote:Whats this?

Toasty - Knowledge (Hotflush)

there is also a nifty thread for questions like this:

http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=34944

Brutal Traxx wrote:Whats this?

You have got to be kidding ?

I would say put this in the ID part but theres nothing to ID

Thanks ver much. That is such a TUNE.

Ta,

epithet wrote:

Brutal Traxx wrote:Whats this?

You have got to be kidding ?

i hate this kind of attitude, you can't just expect people to instantly know what a tune is just because its well known to you, i think it puts people off asking what a tune is because some have the arrogance to laugh at them

dubluke wrote:

epithet wrote:

Brutal Traxx wrote:Whats this?

You have got to be kidding ?

i hate this kind of attitude, you can't just expect people to instantly know what a tune is just because its well known to you, i think it puts people off asking what a tune is because some have the arrogance to laugh at them

LOL, I think he's laughing because there is no link to this 'tune that needs IDing'

Its ok. That comment doesnt bother me. I bet he dont know every single tune made.



Anyway. Thanks for the ID. I hve found the ID thread now and will use that.

BlizzardMusic wrote:

dubluke wrote:

epithet wrote:

Brutal Traxx wrote:Whats this?

You have got to be kidding ?

i hate this kind of attitude, you can't just expect people to instantly know what a tune is just because its well known to you, i think it puts people off asking what a tune is because some have the arrogance to laugh at them

LOL, I think he's laughing because there is no link to this 'tune that needs IDing'

ah well if thats the case i take back what i say and apologise, wasn't so much a personal dig at epithet as a dig at that attitude in general, whether or not he was taking it

dubluke wrote:

BlizzardMusic wrote:

dubluke wrote:

epithet wrote:

Brutal Traxx wrote:Whats this?

You have got to be kidding ?

i hate this kind of attitude, you can't just expect people to instantly know what a tune is just because its well known to you, i think it puts people off asking what a tune is because some have the arrogance to laugh at them

LOL, I think he's laughing because there is no link to this 'tune that needs IDing'

ah well if thats the case i take back what i say and apologise, wasn't so much a personal dig at epithet as a dig at that attitude in general, whether or not he was taking it

sorry for being 'that guy'

BlizzardMusic wrote:

dubluke wrote:

BlizzardMusic wrote:

dubluke wrote:

epithet wrote: You have got to be kidding ?

i hate this kind of attitude, you can't just expect people to instantly know what a tune is just because its well known to you, i think it puts people off asking what a tune is because some have the arrogance to laugh at them

LOL, I think he's laughing because there is no link to this 'tune that needs IDing'

ah well if thats the case i take back what i say and apologise, wasn't so much a personal dig at epithet as a dig at that attitude in general, whether or not he was taking it

sorry for being 'that guy'

haha nah you weren't mate, everyone's gotta be 'that guy' at some point anyway right?

dubluke wrote:

BlizzardMusic wrote:

dubluke wrote:

BlizzardMusic wrote:

dubluke wrote: i hate this kind of attitude, you can't just expect people to instantly know what a tune is just because its well known to you, i think it puts people off asking what a tune is because some have the arrogance to laugh at them

LOL, I think he's laughing because there is no link to this 'tune that needs IDing'

ah well if thats the case i take back what i say and apologise, wasn't so much a personal dig at epithet as a dig at that attitude in general, whether or not he was taking it

sorry for being 'that guy'

haha nah you weren't mate, everyone's gotta be 'that guy' at some point anyway right?

true haha

I just like the way its called 'that guy'

calling a guy 'that' must have been pretty degrading in the start

sorry to be "that guy", but how is "that" degrading?

badger wrote:sorry to be "that guy", but how is "that" degrading?

People have names don't they? If you was called 'that' would you be annoyed?

Would you rather be called 'that' or Badger?

BlizzardMusic wrote:

badger wrote:sorry to be "that guy", but how is "that" degrading?

People have names don't they? If you was called 'that' would you be annoyed?

Would you rather be called 'that' or Badger?

i don't think it means "that guy" in a literal sense, just "that guy" as in the one thats nit picking or whatever at the time

badger wrote:sorry to be "that guy"

New worst saying, ever.

BlizzardMusic wrote:

badger wrote:sorry to be "that guy", but how is "that" degrading?

People have names don't they? If you was called 'that' would you be annoyed?

Would you rather be called 'that' or Badger?

yes but they aren't calling them just "that" they're "that [x]", which is a descriptor. it's like referring to "that chair" rather than just "that". you wouldn't just say sorry for being "guy" would you?

lol sorry for somehow turning a tune ID thread into a debate about semantics

badger wrote:

BlizzardMusic wrote:

badger wrote:sorry to be "that guy", but how is "that" degrading?

People have names don't they? If you was called 'that' would you be annoyed?

Would you rather be called 'that' or Badger?

yes but they aren't calling them just "that" they're "that [x]", which is a descriptor. it's like referring to "that chair" rather than just "that". you wouldn't just say sorry for being "guy" would you?

lol sorry for somehow turning a tune ID thread into a debate about semantics

Yeah true but, I'm just saying it as some people might be offended by being called ''that'' or ''it'' don't you think?

"that" is completely different to "it". i honestly don't know how you can be arguing against the usage of "that".... SMH