ny times on msg board internet trolls
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:33 am
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
The trolls employed what the M.I.T. professor Judith Donath calls a “pseudo-naïve” tactic, asking stupid questions and seeing who would rise to the bait.
ny times wrote:the lulz as a quasi-thermodynamic exchange between the sensitive and the cruel
yeah - exactly.bellybelle wrote:ugh. sociopaths. gross.
as is this bit about moderation of a new forum“It’s not that I do this because I hate them. I do this because I’m trying to save them.”
i'm undecided if that's a good thing or notHe was optimistic about Robot9000, a new 4chan board with a combination of human and machine moderation. Users who make “unoriginal” or “low content” posts are banned from Robot9000 for periods that lengthen with each offense.
Maybe there should be something like that for Dubstep, definately would of banned Pendulum for being unoriginal and gay.badger wrote:i'm undecided if that's a good thing or notHe was optimistic about Robot9000, a new 4chan board with a combination of human and machine moderation. Users who make “unoriginal” or “low content” posts are banned from Robot9000 for periods that lengthen with each offense.
interesting. this kind of reasoning can also be found in serial killers.badger wrote:yeah not pleasant, especially them putting flashing images on an epileptic website. this bit at the end is interesting though (directed at his parents not about those he trolls but i'm sure it's still applicable in a wider context)
“It’s not that I do this because I hate them. I do this because I’m trying to save them.”
I get lulz by dodging and punching back.gravious wrote:This is why i always like to see the whites of people's eyes when i'm talking to them.
It keeps people honest.
It is harder to extract LULZ from someone when you have a freshly broken nose, for example.