Page 1 of 2
BMW Advert - Blatently already been posted
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:29 pm
by manray
But anyway...
This girl is fineeeee. What's her name? Apparantly its an ad from greece by bmw.
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:32 pm
by bright maroon
umm..peado much?..
That was a stock response FYI..
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:02 pm
by geiom
There's more important issues in Greece right now than nice ads for cars.
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:02 pm
by manray
bright maroon wrote:umm..peado much?..
That was a stock response FYI..
Haha. Dunno how old she is but yeah she looks young. Still very beautiful girl. Doesn't change that.
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:21 pm
by bright maroon
..You know you're not the first?
BMW got in that first...
I'm not really panty bunched about this..
..but I do see it..
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:50 am
by automat3000
bright maroon wrote:umm..peado much?..
Fucking idiot. It does my head in when people are so scared to be attracted to girls who look fresh-faced and probably in their teens for fear of being branded somebody who is turned on by pre-pubescent girls. BIG DIFFERENCE.
Unfortunately, i'll probably be branded a paedo for saying exactly this. :sigh:
She's gorgeous btw.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:07 am
by macroclimate
Love the ad!
P.S. nice literary reference in your location automat3000.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:15 am
by bright maroon
Well I can tell the difference between appreciating youthful beauty and commodifing a persons sexuality - in this particular case, their virgnity - or lack thereof..
Aside from young girl being pretty - it's a fairly disgusting ad.
AND CONDESCENING - like we can't tell the difference between fine auto engineering and our desire to bust overpriced childs cherry.
I wasn't really that mad about it - I was sort of joking again..but you didn't really pick up on that..the stock response part.
Can't you people disagree or counter without being so personally abusive?
Stop being so dick tender..
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:54 am
by manray
I think the advert is a bit of bad taste, especially with the girl being so young.
Could have framed a 25 year old girl and still gotten just as good result whilst being a little less risqué.
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:28 am
by macroclimate
I'm not really even attracted to her... I just thought it was a funny ad.
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:34 am
by beerz
u think this girl is young?? im 18 and i think she luks about my age or older....n she's peng btw
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:58 am
by bright maroon
bEErz wrote:u think this girl is young?? im 18 and i think she luks about my age or older....n she's peng btw
It's ok beerz..that is your proper age pool..
..now Imagine you're me right now - and that girl is at least ...15 years younger than you...she would be 2 years..
...that my friend, is peado biz.
Sometimes I forget how young you peoples are...I'm 36..Do I look it?(no cougar)
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:09 am
by bright maroon
Where's the geriatric steppers forum...
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:10 am
by bright maroon
...Last year someone stole my bike...and my parents decided to surprize me with a new one...
..They bought me a little girls bike..for like a 12 year old...It was lavander and said TIARA on it..you should have seen my old fat ass all around town on that thing..I felt like I was BMXing on a glitterbug.
..the only benefit was that no hood was going to nick my glittering tiara.
...the downfall was blowing out my left knee on it...
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:23 am
by jackieboi
Ooft aye she is jailbait!.
Speaking of which! (Or should i say, speaking of WITCH). That little bird Emma Watson (Hermione out of Harry Potter) is apparently getting in the scud in her next film, her being 18 and everything!
Dont ask me for evidence to back up this statement cos i dont have any, just heard it through the office grapevine, which is morealess definite fact as far as i'm concerned.
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:28 am
by theaccuria
im 19 and think she looks mid twentys?
Whats the problem anyway, is a subconcious instict to be attracted to youthfull looking women.
Yes, I said "women", not "kids".
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:49 am
by jackieboi
TheAccuria wrote:im 19 and think she looks mid twentys?
Whats the problem anyway, is a subconcious instict to be attracted to youthfull looking women.
Yes, I said "women", not "kids".
Looks like we got ourselves a molester right here. I'm going to get a hold of your address and put my friends at the daily mail in contact with you.
Have a Merry christmas Ian Huntley!
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:39 pm
by bright maroon
Well, considering that in the past, people were married and had 2 kids by the time they were 15...then sure go ahead..13 year old, your choice...
(I'm not really trying to be all serious and weird here - I'm about to bust out laughing)
At age 22, I was still and idiot - At 24, I started to get a clue - at 27, the holographic universe exploded inside of my skull...
(insert whale noises here)
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:14 pm
by bright maroon
Oh shit..I can't post on a board without explaining myself..my attitude and tone are not being reflected in words...
look ya'll...I feel snarky, yet light..
shakespearian tone here:
The ad in question,
stikes me,
being a slightly ag'ed female,
as being a bit exploitive - and yet I feel light,
and unfettered,
as it has no actual effect on my person in reality,
so be gone idiot caller.
I banish you thus.
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:45 pm
by theaccuria
jackieboi wrote:TheAccuria wrote:im 19 and think she looks mid twentys?
Whats the problem anyway, is a subconcious instict to be attracted to youthfull looking women.
Yes, I said "women", not "kids".
Looks like we got ourselves a molester right here. I'm going to get a hold of your address and put my friends at the daily mail in contact with you.
Have a Merry christmas Ian Huntley!
FUCK!
*Runs to texas*