Dubstepforum.com

dont you guys know that v0 is better? v0 tends to peak at ~240 or something anyway, so i'd rather have 256s than 320s. dubstep tracks are unnecessarily long anyway (i made a thread about that but it mysteriously disappeared), a 2 track dubstep digital release shouldnt be fucking 25mb. i'm not made out of hard drives here.

get em telt

320mg

Hard drives are cheap these days save me the sob story. Christ fucking sakes people will bitch about anything and everything on here.

lawl u is poor

Constrobuz wrote:dubstep tracks are unnecessarily long anyway.

LOL

v0 is not better, its more lossy than 320.
There will not be a huge difference unless its played on a large soundsystem.
If you prefer v0 use v0, why make this thread?

hmmm.

Tobo wrote:v0 is not better, its more lossy than 320.
There will not be a huge difference unless its played on a large soundsystem.
If you prefer v0 use v0, why make this thread?

even audiophiles who have most of there music archived in lossless format and have ridiculously expensive audio equipment agree 320 is overkill.

also its not as simple as "just use v0 then" because conversion from lossy to lossy results in loss of quality. also my issue is with file size, not quality (that doesnt mean i don't have a problem converting though, i do... god damnit that was a poor sequence of sentences).

airtight wrote:hmmm.

you got something in your eye boy?

Flac or GTFO

i prefer WAVs, tbh

64kb radio rips ftw tbf

Constrobuz wrote:

Tobo wrote:v0 is not better, its more lossy than 320.
There will not be a huge difference unless its played on a large soundsystem.
If you prefer v0 use v0, why make this thread?

even audiophiles who have most of there music archived in lossless format and have ridiculously expensive audio equipment agree 320 is overkill.

also its not as simple as "just use v0 then" because conversion from lossy to lossy results in loss of quality. also my issue is with file size, not quality (that doesnt mean i don't have a problem converting though, i do... god damnit that was a poor sequence of sentences).

That is totally false I frequent a few audiophile sites and 99% of them won't listen to anything but Flac or Wav. You are typing nonsense.

abZ wrote:

Constrobuz wrote:

Tobo wrote:v0 is not better, its more lossy than 320.
There will not be a huge difference unless its played on a large soundsystem.
If you prefer v0 use v0, why make this thread?

even audiophiles who have most of there music archived in lossless format and have ridiculously expensive audio equipment agree 320 is overkill.

also its not as simple as "just use v0 then" because conversion from lossy to lossy results in loss of quality. also my issue is with file size, not quality (that doesnt mean i don't have a problem converting though, i do... god damnit that was a poor sequence of sentences).

That is totally false I frequent a few audiophile sites and 99% of them won't listen to anything but Flac or Wav. You are typing nonsense.

obviously i was speaking in terms of .mp3, not every audio file type. reread my post, i even say the audiophiles have their personal music in lossless.

Seriously, who cares?
just enjoy the music!

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822154294

Lacie 1TB external for USD $150

and you're complaining about 25mb? please

lol

Constrobuz wrote:

abZ wrote:

Constrobuz wrote:

Tobo wrote:v0 is not better, its more lossy than 320.
There will not be a huge difference unless its played on a large soundsystem.
If you prefer v0 use v0, why make this thread?

even audiophiles who have most of there music archived in lossless format and have ridiculously expensive audio equipment agree 320 is overkill.

also its not as simple as "just use v0 then" because conversion from lossy to lossy results in loss of quality. also my issue is with file size, not quality (that doesnt mean i don't have a problem converting though, i do... god damnit that was a poor sequence of sentences).

That is totally false I frequent a few audiophile sites and 99% of them won't listen to anything but Flac or Wav. You are typing nonsense.

obviously i was speaking in terms of .mp3, not every audio file type. reread my post, i even say the audiophiles have their personal music in lossless.

That doesn't make any sense at all man.

this is ridiculous...i want to call wind up but i know its not

the word 'music' mean anything to you?

abZ wrote:people will bitch about anything and everything on here.

this