Re: Why cant wobble and Dub heads just get along?
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:22 pm
Yeah, nah its the style thats the problem
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
If you go through sites such as digital-tunes.net and listen to a lot of these releases, you'll be subjected to a a glut of clonestep which is increasingly becoming a chore to sift through for the good stuff (but the good stuff is still there!)dubloke wrote:This sound has become stagnant
i couldnt disagree morepress wrote:i can't help but think how fucking boring and stagnant and non-"forward thinking" this genre would be if it were still only sounding like it did in 03-05. People still make that stuff and people make jumpup stuff. Whats great about dubstep is that its dubby its midrangy its deep its in your face its heady its a little of everything. I got into dubstep not nessecarily because i liked everything that was coming out at the time but because i knew it could be so much more it had room to encompass just about everyones favorite style. No one sound deserves to be here more than another. I dont really like jump-up and i dont really like super deep stuff, i want more in the middle where does that fit in all this? dubstep should be less this vs that and more this with a little that. i dunno i still love it and i still love dnb to so go figure.
kion wrote:dubloke wrote:This sound has become stagnant
well thats definitely a big part. i dont remember what the first couple dubstep tracks i heard were, but my first two records i bought weredrokkr wrote:Either they were shown Dubstep by a mate but it was a DMZ style track or something like it on that end of the spectrum (Toasty "The Knowledge" for me) OR they heard a certain CD that Fabric released a while back. Already you had a picture painted in your head of what Dubstep was. Like, when you first found that track that made you brain go "whatthefuckisthis", I think that tie yourself to that sound in some way.
wascal wrote:this x 1000000kion wrote:...it's usually that the wobble is underpinned by uninspired drums.
deadly habit wrote:why is it always people who just registered to this forum within the last couple years asking these retarded questions?
yea that certainly feels the case 99% of the time.......if a style reaches a certain level of exposure but the rest remains well beneath the surface then the prominent style will be most likely to be what people are (first) exposed to on the radio, tv, in clubs, in mass marketed magazines and at festivals. Obviously in the case of dubstep that prominent style is now ever predictable, loud, aggressive and cheesy and therefore is not going to appeal to anyone unless they are 16-23 yrs old, male and used to like Blink182 or think that danny byrd is a great dnb producer.benw wrote:Lets put it this way - I no longer bother to tell people that i listen to/play dubstep because i know that what theyre thinking of when they hear that word is so different to what i mean.