Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 9:09 pm
I'm inDeadly Habit wrote:FSTZ wrote:give 'em da clamps
bitches don't know bout the robot mafia
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
I'm inDeadly Habit wrote:FSTZ wrote:give 'em da clamps
bitches don't know bout the robot mafia
sure that's all true but where does that tie in to people's originality lacking?seckle wrote:totally agree. good music always gets through...always.SILKIE wrote:the problem is there is this concept of a dubtep noah of arch and people feel like the boat is gonna leave the dock soon so whether they are ready or not they have gotta get as much people as possible hear there music or ill be left behind. first impressions is alot so if u let the mass hear the raw material before its toned up their opinion of u is hard to shake and may for years even though u have vastly improved not listen to ur stuff when they see ur name.
the question is how much work and how long a graft are you willing to go through to get your name out there? what are you bringing to the table thats different and stands out? a lot of people just want to sit at home and click buttons on myspace/fcbk and think that they'll be sensations by the morning with worldwide acceptance. that can happen for maybe 3 or 4 people out of 1000...but 98% of the others won't be that lucky.
these trains of thought don't really work....
make demo tunes>send these tunes to the biggest dubstep labels on myspace(even though you've not met any of those people in real life or even tried to establish a relationship...just "here's my cdr. listen to it")
make demo tunes>send them to all the big dj's calling it "the most gangster shit you've ever heard" in the email while eating a bowl of soup and wearing knives and bandannas on your myspace.
this is better...
make tunes>send them to friends>get feedback>more work on them>send them to a local dj to see its response in a local club while you're there watching>refine tunes some more>send tunes to one specific big name dj that plays a similar sounding style>see if you get feedback>if not, send to another big name dj>go to parties. go meet people and drink with them. if you don't live near a big party, get a job and get your shit together.
most people are lazy, straight up.
very very very few people are completely original. those that are, have taken a very long time experimenting with their sound and what they want to say with it.Piston wrote: sure that's all true but where does that tie in to people's originality lacking?
and surely the above statement goes against having your own sound?
dubstep HAS to be a local thing before its a worldwide thing unless you are in the middle of nowhere.this is better...
make tunes>send them to friends>get feedback>more work on them>send them to a local dj to see its response in a local club while you're there watching>refine tunes some more>send tunes to one specific big name dj that plays a similar sounding style>see if you get feedback>if not, send to another big name dj>go to parties. go meet people and drink with them. if you don't live near a big party, get a job and get your shit together.
for the record i don't think good music needs to be original...i was merely stating that this thread was about unoriginality and i thought seckle appeared to be agreeing but then i thought made a statement that went against this ethossoundbwoy wrote:also you don't have to be especially original, you just have to be quality - you don't have to be blatantly different or whatever, but you gotta at least have a mature sound and VERY VERY GOOD PRODUCTION. theres an art in perfecting a form
tru say bellybellebellybelle wrote:strange.....because there is a problem with all this "originality"
if you're too original, you don't get heard.
if you're unoriginal, you don't get heard.
so when people say you need to be original, they're really saying, "Be original enough that based on what I'm listening to, its different....but not different enough to alienate me while I listen to it."
Be a bit more fair here.....you don't necessarily want originality. You want originality within a box. Originality within the set of parameters you are comfortable with. Because too original gets you as many props as the formulaic ones get.
I mean what was that quote....something about you'll know when you're original because you'll have to ram it down peoples throats....isn't that a sig here? Doesn't that say something about the fickle relationship with originality?
Make what you want. Listen to what you want. If you don't like it, move on.
+1.-boring wrote: dubstep HAS to be a local thing before its a worldwide thing
BIG timebellybelle wrote:strange.....because there is a problem with all this "originality"
if you're too original, you don't get heard.
if you're unoriginal, you don't get heard.
so when people say you need to be original, they're really saying, "Be original enough that based on what I'm listening to, its different....but not different enough to alienate me while I listen to it."
Be a bit more fair here.....you don't necessarily want originality. You want originality within a box. Originality within the set of parameters you are comfortable with. Because too original gets you as many props as the formulaic ones get.
I mean what was that quote....something about you'll know when you're original because you'll have to ram it down peoples throats....isn't that a sig here? Doesn't that say something about the fickle relationship with originality?
Make what you want. Listen to what you want. If you don't like it, move on.