Page 2 of 4
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:07 pm
by Lethal Dosage
So what if you don't like the music with no sub bass or whatever. I'm not a fan of folk or indie. It's different and other people like it. Don't cry because the label 'dubstep' is being tarnished. Its a new genre you can't complain. Most people including myself have never heard of it before the likes of skrillex was shown to me. Music is beyond genre. When I used to listen to metal I didn't complain that the label 'metal' or 'screamo' was used to describe all kinds of metal music even the more gay stuff that was not my taste or in my opinion metal.
Akira wrote:Hopefully as the scene expands, be it through the over commercialisation or whatever it increases the chance that people will be turned onto the brilliant music by the likes of mala, loefah, burial, quest , silkie etccc.
That's whats important. I got into the good stuff and learned to love it by being first introduced to skrillex and that heavy dubstep sound, which I still like but not all of it. I woke up and realised the old stuff is better when high.
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:11 pm
by garethom
Lethal Dosage wrote:Its a new genre you can't complain.
Is a genre that's been around for about 10 years new?
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:12 pm
by incnic
Akira wrote:incnic wrote:SOME RLY INTESRING PEOPLE IN HERE

Dont you go trollin on my posts!
nah probs neh worreis in the loldonalds

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:21 pm
by Lethal Dosage
garethom wrote:Lethal Dosage wrote:Its a new genre you can't complain.
Is a genre that's been around for about 10 years new?
For how long music has been around then yes.
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:42 pm
by Akira
Lethal Dosage wrote:Don't cry because the label 'dubstep' is being tarnished. Its a new genre you can't complain.
Im not crying, im just saying its not very sonically pleasing, in terms of the sound spectrum its pretty extreme and its hurtful. and its not a new genre.....jesus christ..
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:49 pm
by NickUndercover
Lethal Dosage wrote:That's whats important. I got into the good stuff and learned to love it by being first introduced to skrillex and that heavy dubstep sound, which I still like but not all of it. I woke up and realised the old stuff is better.
^^^^ Cool mate !!
And yes, Doctor P and skwilliks DO hurt my ears. I'm 17 that's wayyy too early to get tinnitus.
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:11 pm
by drugmoney
mala and skrillex should do a release together so everyone can shut the fuck up about it already.
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:43 pm
by NickUndercover
drugmoney wrote:mala and skrillex should do a release together so everyone can shut the fuck up about it already.
LOL no fucking way he even corrupted Diplo, like a cancer I tell ya
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:01 pm
by garethom
Lethal Dosage wrote:garethom wrote:Lethal Dosage wrote:Its a new genre you can't complain.
Is a genre that's been around for about 10 years new?
For how long music has been around then yes.

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:04 pm
by JensMadsen
Yes, it needs a sub, and yes it can have both a mid-range bass sound and a sub at the same time. Stay open-minded and listen to new music as well. But if you want to get away from a lot of mid-range sounds, try a bit of 130-138 bpm bass instead? You might need to look a little harder for the great music though, but people are still making it.
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:03 pm
by wooda916
i havn't looked at this forum for a while but when did this place become so full of twats who "troll" every post?
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:06 pm
by JensMadsen
wooda916 wrote:i havn't looked at this forum for a while but when did this place become so full of twats who "troll" every post?
Yes, it's been really bad recently.
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:32 pm
by Metabolic
sub + 'midrange cack' as some folks put it, is the way forward, for me not dubstep' so yea sub is a huge part of dubstep
why all the hate on the brostep? jus coz you dont like it that makes it wrong and shit? naw mate....dubstep has gone mainstream now deal with it, ppl like me are makin this disgustingly horrible bass music for the same reason heavy metal progressed into what it is...well was...to stay away from the mainstream and it just sounds so nice to someone like me
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:58 pm
by incnic
wooda916 wrote:i havn't looked at this forum for a while but when did this place become so full of twats who "troll" every post?
in mcdonlads

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:58 pm
by NickUndercover
Metabolic wrote:dubstep has gone mainstream now deal with it,
I beg to differ here. I think you're mistaking the hate on brostep for a hate on mainstream music. The Vision was uploaded on UKF and got more than 800 000 hits. Everyone here will agree it's a good tune though. Same goes for the remix Distance made for Jess Mils, around 500 000 hits. When a tune sounds like shit, it sounds like shit no matter how mainstream or underground it is. If good, bassy dubstep like Joker and Distance gets pushed by platforms like UKF I will be more than happy with it. But these are the 2 only good tunes I've ever heard coming from that channel, even though I do hope there's more to come
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:58 pm
by JensMadsen
Metabolic wrote:sub + 'midrange cack' as some folks put it, is the way forward, for me not dubstep' so yea sub is a huge part of dubstep
why all the hate on the brostep? jus coz you dont like it that makes it wrong and shit? naw mate....dubstep has gone mainstream now deal with it, ppl like me are makin this disgustingly horrible bass music for the same reason heavy metal progressed into what it is...well was...to stay away from the mainstream and it just sounds so nice to someone like me
The fuck are you doing on dubstepforum then mate?
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 6:10 pm
by Metabolic
coz the brostep forum's full of freaks.....besides this places has alot of good info
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 6:13 pm
by garethom
Metabolic wrote:sub + 'midrange cack' as some folks put it, is the way forward
When did the committee on Dubstep Affairs decide this?
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 6:27 pm
by Metabolic
garethom wrote:Metabolic wrote:sub + 'midrange cack' as some folks put it, is the way forward
When did the committee on Dubstep Affairs decide this?
'sub + 'midrange cack' as some folk put it, is the way forward, for me not dubstep'
Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 6:33 pm
by Sheff
Rönin wrote:Metabolic wrote:dubstep has gone mainstream now deal with it,
I beg to differ here. I think you're mistaking the hate on brostep for a hate on mainstream music. The Vision was uploaded on UKF and got more than 800 000 hits. Everyone here will agree it's a good tune though. Same goes for the remix Distance made for Jess Mils, around 500 000 hits. When a tune sounds like shit, it sounds like shit no matter how mainstream or underground it is. If good, bassy dubstep like Joker and Distance gets pushed by platforms like UKF I will be more than happy with it. But these are the 2 only good tunes I've ever heard coming from that channel, even though I do hope there's more to come
well said
