Dubstepforum.com

all about the 25-1's... maybe that headband might actually stick on your head

noam wrote:all about the 25-1's... maybe that headband might actually stick on your head

if they sound the same then im inclined to save 60 quid myself

paying more money for things makes me feel like i have a massive dick tho... so i'd splash the cash myself

Pistonsbeneath wrote:

noam wrote:all about the 25-1's... maybe that headband might actually stick on your head

if they sound the same then im inclined to save 60 quid myself

HD 25-SP II: lower-cost alternative to the HD 25 II, featuring a simpler headband and a slightly different capsule design.

Whenever I have used them the sound soesn't seem as good as the HD25 II- not such good isolation either, but that could just be because of the headband and not being held as tightly to the ear or the different capsule or something, not sure if they use the same speakers in the capsule.

No love for beats headphones by Dre?

kidshuffle wrote:I can't stand those little headphones. They just don't feel right to me, but I know lots of people who have no complaints.

I'm currently using the Sennheiser hd 280 pro's, I love em

this, all day

Pedro Sánchez wrote:No love for beats headphones by Dre?

I'm in this thread as I have Beats Solo and am looking for something a bit better. I mean, they're great but the isolation is shite on them, and I don't think Beats are a case of "You get what you pay for" - £180. Aiaiai shits are tempting me

Aiaiai...How do you even pronounce that?
Their in-earphones for out and about look ok mind, had some good reviews.

The Beats show that all you need is a good marketing campaign, it's doesn't really matter about the product.

say_whut wrote:

Pedro Sánchez wrote:No love for beats headphones by Dre?

I'm in this thread as I have Beats Solo and am looking for something a bit better. I mean, they're great but the isolation is shite on them, and I don't think Beats are a case of "You get what you pay for" - £180. Aiaiai shits are tempting me

lol you seriously bought them?!

amazing

well in mate

the cost of "beats" far surpass their technical merit. they are crap.

Duffman wrote:The Beats show that all you need is a good marketing campaign, it's doesn't really matter about the product.

Bad marketing more like, just celebrity endorsement, they are actually 'Monster' who have a rep for making overpriced shitty audio cables.

noam wrote:

say_whut wrote:

Pedro Sánchez wrote:No love for beats headphones by Dre?

I'm in this thread as I have Beats Solo and am looking for something a bit better. I mean, they're great but the isolation is shite on them, and I don't think Beats are a case of "You get what you pay for" - £180. Aiaiai shits are tempting me

lol you seriously bought them?!

amazing

well in mate

I didn't bUy them, 2010 christmas present from da family. They do the job, but I think folk are swayed by the fact they are Beats and have appeared in fuck tonnes of music vids and films therefore must be awesome. Beats were even shown in Book of Eli

Were me AKG crew at!?!?!?!?!!!

SP-II are shit compared to the standard HD-25

Also make sure you get the velour ear pads especially if you have a big head like me, they are way comfier!

thanks for the help guys (not gwa)

(Pada) wrote:SP-II are shit compared to the standard HD-25

yup, thats why theyre so much cheaper than normal 25s

sound quality is similair to the HD202s (which are REALLY shite)

fuck off they aint shite

they're cheap

noam wrote:fuck off they aint shite

they're cheap

compared to there big brother, yea theyre shite

if they cost £100 then i'd agree

but since they cos the same as a bag of weed then i'll disagree

for £20 you cant really buy better headphones