worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
gwa wrote:disco
And I was talking about turntablism, not mixing.Terpit wrote:Faster genres are easier to mix if anything, certainly not harder, there are more beats so you can tell if its in time more easily if that makes sense
shmurnshmabilizmGenevieve wrote:And I was talking about turntablism, not mixing.Terpit wrote:Faster genres are easier to mix if anything, certainly not harder, there are more beats so you can tell if its in time more easily if that makes sense
DJ lethalparticle-jim wrote:Nu-metal obviously
Nah mate, Mr Hansouthstar wrote:DJ lethalparticle-jim wrote:Nu-metal obviously
I'd actually say the opposite of that. A faster beat (and more beats) mean that it's a lot easier for it to sound total wank. For example, D&B is a lot harder to mix than DubstepTerpit wrote:Faster genres are easier to mix if anything, certainly not harder, there are more beats so you can tell if its in time more easily if that makes sense
thats because dnb has a slight variation in tempoDRTY wrote:I'd actually say the opposite of that. A faster beat (and more beats) mean that it's a lot easier for it to sound total wank. For example, D&B is a lot harder to mix than DubstepTerpit wrote:Faster genres are easier to mix if anything, certainly not harder, there are more beats so you can tell if its in time more easily if that makes sense
that as well, but I think it's harder even with two records that are the same bpm than two 140stravis baker wrote:thats because dnb has a slight variation in tempoDRTY wrote:I'd actually say the opposite of that. A faster beat (and more beats) mean that it's a lot easier for it to sound total wank. For example, D&B is a lot harder to mix than DubstepTerpit wrote:Faster genres are easier to mix if anything, certainly not harder, there are more beats so you can tell if its in time more easily if that makes sense
When using cdjs I find it fairly hard to mix a 138 and. 141 dubstep tune for example, beats are so far apart, don't get that with dnb because there's such a steady beat, it might be just me tho.DRTY wrote:that as well, but I think it's harder even with two records that are the same bpm than two 140stravis baker wrote:thats because dnb has a slight variation in tempoDRTY wrote:I'd actually say the opposite of that. A faster beat (and more beats) mean that it's a lot easier for it to sound total wank. For example, D&B is a lot harder to mix than DubstepTerpit wrote:Faster genres are easier to mix if anything, certainly not harder, there are more beats so you can tell if its in time more easily if that makes sense
Terpit wrote:When using cdjs I find it fairly hard to mix a 138 and. 141 dubstep tune for example, beats are so far apart, don't get that with dnb because there's such a steady beat, it might be just me tho.DRTY wrote:that as well, but I think it's harder even with two records that are the same bpm than two 140stravis baker wrote:thats because dnb has a slight variation in tempoDRTY wrote:I'd actually say the opposite of that. A faster beat (and more beats) mean that it's a lot easier for it to sound total wank. For example, D&B is a lot harder to mix than DubstepTerpit wrote:Faster genres are easier to mix if anything, certainly not harder, there are more beats so you can tell if its in time more easily if that makes sense