Dubstepforum.com

srsly

the new stuff they came up with is to put your shampoo into plastic bags and not let you bring bottles of perfume on board

pk wrote:

Parson wrote:i suppose these planes were equpped with thermite that cut through the building foundations like a knife through butter too

pressure & heat

for somebody who blindly accepts mainstream science as fact, you sure don't investigate it too well.

in a pre-9/11 world, why would you immediately shoot down a hijacked plane?

pk wrote:in a pre-9/11 world, why would you immediately shoot down a hijacked plane?

good point

because thats how its always been done

terrorists have been a "threat" forever.
just because people started paying closer attention to their bullshit propaganda after 9/11 doesn't mean that they weren't constantly pumping these fear memes out and preparing for a terror war. if anything they could justify it with the commie threat.

its also been a ridiculous plot to fly planes into buildings because even the most skilled pilots know they couldn't pull that off with any amount of accuracy

fuagofire wrote:

pk wrote:in a pre-9/11 world, why would you immediately shoot down a hijacked plane?

good point

you guys are so lol

i'm gonna have to log out for a bit.

it excites me too much when people start talkin like this.

Parson wrote:srsly

the new stuff they came up with is to put your shampoo into plastic bags and not let you bring bottles of perfume on board

and even still, i got my pepper spray to NYC and back and my lighter came with me in my purse to LA and back... hahahaha @ our security being dependent on whether or not someone gets their break on time or not

Parson wrote: this was even predicted by the X-FILES earlier that year
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIZ205ccX8M

This is my favorite EVER conspiracy theory, did you see the BBC program where they interviewed the writer of the X Files and talked to him about 9/11 and other theories?

Best theory evaaar though, srsly, nice 1.

@ PK - those power of nightmare films are awesome, you might enjoy Pandoras box made by the same guy (different subjects though). All available here..

http://best.online.docus.googlepages.com/

Parson wrote:

pk wrote:

Parson wrote:i suppose these planes were equpped with thermite that cut through the building foundations like a knife through butter too

pressure & heat

for somebody who blindly accepts mainstream science as fact, you sure don't investigate it too well.

all the factors involved in a non-conspiratorial collapse of the world trade centre are taken in isolation. the fires didn't burn hot enough, the impact didn't knock the towers over etc

combine the weakening effect of the physical impact of the plane, the kinetic energy from the 10,000 gallons of fuel, the heat from said 10,000 gallons catching fire, the heat from everything else in the area catching fire and the weight of the top quarter of the building on a rapidly weakening support structure and voila

Parson wrote:because thats how its always been done

terrorists have been a "threat" forever.
just because people started paying closer attention to their bullshit propaganda after 9/11 doesn't mean that they weren't constantly pumping these fear memes out and preparing for a terror war. if anything they could justify it with the commie threat.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/636375.stm

that was flown from afghanistan to the uk and not once did anyone try to shoot it down

last i checked, darpa wasn't patrolling there

pk wrote:

Parson wrote:

pk wrote:

Parson wrote:i suppose these planes were equpped with thermite that cut through the building foundations like a knife through butter too

pressure & heat

for somebody who blindly accepts mainstream science as fact, you sure don't investigate it too well.

all the factors involved in a non-conspiratorial collapse of the world trade centre are taken in isolation. the fires didn't burn hot enough, the impact didn't knock the towers over etc

combine the weakening effect of the physical impact of the plane, the kinetic energy from the 10,000 gallons of fuel, the heat from said 10,000 gallons catching fire, the heat from everything else in the area catching fire and the weight of the top quarter of the building on a rapidly weakening support structure and voila

and voila what? thermite cuts through the foundation at perfect angles in stratetic locations? are you serious?

those factors are enough to cause a big ugly mess in the sides of some buildings but are far from enough to cause a controlled demoltion

thermite cuts through the foundation at perfect angles in stratetic locations?

where did that come from?

only evidence of perfect angles i've seen is those ground-level beams photographed days/weeks into the cleanup operation, which could've been cut at any time by the workmen to ease the disposal of debris

as for the thermite theory, the heat levels reached inside each tower accounts for any apparent evidence for it

no they don't. nothing accounts for the heat of thermite but thermite

Im with mr chomsky on this 9/11 thing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzGd0t8v-d4

he is absolutely correct about how all kinds of facists benefited from 9/11.

still does not address the thermite or the rest of the of the evidence for a planned controlled demolition, on top of the fact that darpa won't let planes hit anything, and its also near impossible for well trained pilots to maneuver planes like that

not to mention the lack of any plane parts at the pentagon or that mysterious plane that disintigrated in the midwest

http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtop ... =17&t=2869

big long debate about it

yeah i'm less interested in debating as i am blown away by people still buying that terrorist crap

and also this democracy crap where the people on tv are making decisions [lol]

if we could extend people's lifespans by like 50 years there's no way people could be herded and deceived so easily. in the cosmic scale, we've got the memory of fruit flies