Page 3 of 3

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:28 am
by hasezwei
if someone could elaborate on what a sound design tut would be about i would maybe ask for it. maybe.

if it means i'll turn from experimentation to knowing how to create/change certain sounds in the way i imagine, then OH MY GOD DISREGARD EVERYTHING I EVER SAID I WANT THAT!
if not, then i prefer stereo mixing :P

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:38 am
by hans blix
3za wrote:i.e. son clave
What like that that kick drum in that Roboskank tune in your sig?

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:53 am
by Anain
I'd like a good tutorial on making drum hits with synths and samples. I have a bit of experience, but haven't even scratched the surface on what could be done.

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:50 pm
by 3za
hans blix wrote:
3za wrote:i.e. son clave
What like that that kick drum in that Roboskank tune in your sig?
no, thats not son clave.

here is a little vid about it.


Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:10 pm
by deadly_habit
any other ideas?

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:12 pm
by nitz
deadly habit wrote:any other ideas?
Do this ...

which area do you think you have the most comprehensive understanding ...? then do that one :)

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:35 pm
by deadly_habit
nitz wrote:
deadly habit wrote:any other ideas?
Do this ...

which area do you think you have the most comprehensive understanding ...? then do that one :)
that's no fun cause i know everything there is to know obviously :6:
nah i'd rather do tutorials on what people want to know, rather than techniques i use, because a good chunk of the time i'm experimenting and trying new things which may not always work or be helpful for others.

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:40 pm
by upstateface
I want tutorials on twisty reeses like this

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:43 pm
by deadly_habit
DOA is => that way

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:46 pm
by upstateface
deadly habit wrote:DOA is => that way
DOA sucks :|

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:48 pm
by Phigure
upstateface wrote:
deadly habit wrote:DOA is => that way
DOA sucks :|

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:50 pm
by Depone
upstateface wrote:I want tutorials on twisty reeses like this
I have that LP on wax 8)
Its rare and is worth about £50 on ebay

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:51 pm
by upstateface
Depone wrote:
upstateface wrote:I want tutorials on twisty reeses like this
I have that LP on wax 8)
Its rare and is worth about £50 on ebay
Wanna give it to me for free? It's not worth anything anymore I checked. :6:

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:52 pm
by deadly_habit
Depone wrote:
upstateface wrote:I want tutorials on twisty reeses like this
I have that LP on wax 8)
Its rare and is worth about £50 on ebay
that's all it's worth?

people bitching about DOA yet wanting to know about reeses = does not compute

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:58 pm
by Depone
deadly habit wrote:
Depone wrote:
upstateface wrote:I want tutorials on twisty reeses like this
I have that LP on wax 8)
Its rare and is worth about £50 on ebay
that's all it's worth?

people bitching about DOA yet wanting to know about reeses = does not compute
saying that i just found its 'sampler' not the full LP for £40 so yeah i would say its worth more like £70. rare shit. Just like my original copy of Inside the machine.

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:04 pm
by deadly_habit
Depone wrote:
deadly habit wrote:
Depone wrote:
upstateface wrote:I want tutorials on twisty reeses like this
I have that LP on wax 8)
Its rare and is worth about £50 on ebay
that's all it's worth?

people bitching about DOA yet wanting to know about reeses = does not compute
saying that i just found its 'sampler' not the full LP for £40 so yeah i would say its worth more like £70. rare shit. Just like my original copy of Inside the machine.
i'll stick with my metalheadz tin, venetian snares - shitfuckers, or 23 degrees from vertical off the top of my head :6:

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:46 am
by Mushroom Buttons
JFK wrote:
nitz wrote:recreating analogue sound feel !

PSP, and tape saturation is kinda all i know on this topic
Yaeh +1 for this.

You run a lot of your bits to tape dont you Deadly? A general discussion on this and other techniques for getting that warmth would be really interesting.
Yeah! Maybe even touch on downsampling/bit reduction? Or are those in the distortion category?

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:56 pm
by Undrig
Would love to see a tut on diff techniques using resampling and other methods to conserve cpu/ram while keeping the workflow going in a smooth non-destructive manner.

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:04 pm
by darigan
Something on layering different breaks together and with one shot drums as well, and just break manipulation in general would be interesting. Something I've been playing around with abit latey.

Re: what would you guys like an in depth tutorial on?

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:31 pm
by JBE
I read in a few posts about a workflow tutorial, and personally, as much as I love watching some of these masterclass videos simple because they show you some of their workflow processes that they go through, it's also difficult to take anything away from those processes as sometimes it just doesn't work for me. I think creating a useable workflow tutorial as far as track layouts, would be very difficult, cause even the person making the tutorial most likely doesn't have a "set in stone" process that they use on every single track. Sometimes the processes aren't even readily available on another DAW than the one being used by the tutorial producer. I think, if you're going to do something like that, it would generally have to be moved away from a tutorial style video, and just more of a, "So I'm working on this track and I'm going to record myself as I go". I think even then, because you're recording yourself, you're going to end up not doing things entirely as if there was no one watching cause there's probably things you do that you either don't want people to see or you just don't want to admit that you do, and that's the stuff that ends up being what people really want to know about.

I think I would have to throw my vote in on the compression suggestion. Compression has always eluded me and it would be great to get some really good in depth info on how it works and ways it's best used.