Dubstepforum.com

deadly habit wrote:

orangeluva56 wrote:

deadly habit wrote:You mean his story that is full of so many inconsistencies and flip flopping that he should be a politician? Injuries he wouldn't have sustained had he not been racially profiling and acting like a LEA by confronting someone?
Shit his "injuries" look tamer than a fall off a skateboard or a typical high school fist fight.
If he was being "overpowered" and "his life was in danger" how the hell did he manage to get his gun and shoot?
He didn't even have to take the stand because he blabbed so much pre-trial in interviews and his footage with cops to know the guy had no place doing what he was.
I don't know about you, but if I'm walking home at night in the rain and some guy is following me, doesn't identify who they are or if they're cops, if they approach me I'm going to be on the defensive and might even strike first if they don't state their intent.
One things for sure even if found not guilty take this fuckers concealed carry license away.

the law just states that zimmerman needs to be in fear for his life. he doesn't even need injuries. if im walking home at night in the rain i can understand if someone is alarmed by my presence even if i dont have any illegal intent. if someone immediately goes for the violent option after someone approaches them then that is a problem. that is where trayvon fucked up, he got into a fight with zimmerman and was supposedly on top of him. trayvon had wounds on his knuckles so that supports zimmerman's story. he gave zimmerman a broken nose so i doubt he was trying to hold zimmerman's hands down to prevent him from reaching for his gun. he grabbed it and shot trayvon in the chest at point blank range.

zimmerman was wrong for following trayvon but trayvon was wrong for attacking zimmerman and unfortunately it cost him his life.

See that supports testimony only from one side, the other can't testify since they're dead. For all we know Zimmerman was the initial aggressor of the conflict, who just started losing the upper hand, and his actions up until the conflict certainly support that as a very plausible theory.
The man's own story doesn't match up to that though, and since he refused to take the stand all that's left is his police call, interviews with police, and interviews with media, all which have inconsistent and changing details.
Hell under that interpretation of the law Trayvon could have shot Zimmerman by that definition if he had been a conceal carry holder.

orangeluva56 wrote:

deadly habit wrote:

orangeluva56 wrote:

deadly habit wrote:You mean his story that is full of so many inconsistencies and flip flopping that he should be a politician? Injuries he wouldn't have sustained had he not been racially profiling and acting like a LEA by confronting someone?
Shit his "injuries" look tamer than a fall off a skateboard or a typical high school fist fight.
If he was being "overpowered" and "his life was in danger" how the hell did he manage to get his gun and shoot?
He didn't even have to take the stand because he blabbed so much pre-trial in interviews and his footage with cops to know the guy had no place doing what he was.
I don't know about you, but if I'm walking home at night in the rain and some guy is following me, doesn't identify who they are or if they're cops, if they approach me I'm going to be on the defensive and might even strike first if they don't state their intent.
One things for sure even if found not guilty take this fuckers concealed carry license away.

the law just states that zimmerman needs to be in fear for his life. he doesn't even need injuries. if im walking home at night in the rain i can understand if someone is alarmed by my presence even if i dont have any illegal intent. if someone immediately goes for the violent option after someone approaches them then that is a problem. that is where trayvon fucked up, he got into a fight with zimmerman and was supposedly on top of him. trayvon had wounds on his knuckles so that supports zimmerman's story. he gave zimmerman a broken nose so i doubt he was trying to hold zimmerman's hands down to prevent him from reaching for his gun. he grabbed it and shot trayvon in the chest at point blank range.

zimmerman was wrong for following trayvon but trayvon was wrong for attacking zimmerman and unfortunately it cost him his life.

See that supports testimony only from one side, the other can't testify since they're dead. For all we know Zimmerman was the initial aggressor of the conflict, who just started losing the upper hand, and his actions up until the conflict certainly support that as a very plausible theory.
The man's own story doesn't match up to that though, and since he refused to take the stand all that's left is his police call, interviews with police, and interviews with media, all which have inconsistent and changing details.
Hell under that interpretation of the law Trayvon could have shot Zimmerman by that definition if he had been a conceal carry holder.

im not aware of what the inconsistent details are but i do think zimmerman made a mistake by not taking the stand.

i cant see how you can say that zimmerman was the aggressor and losing the upper hand when trayvon's only injury was the gunshot. it seems obvious, at least to me, that trayvon jumped on zimmerman and started pummeling him. this would mean that trayvon was on top of zimmerman, which is consistent with the gunshot wound expert's opinion.

Phase Down wrote:ok the guy made a mistake getting out of his car but the guy was up to no good so he could feel its his duty to go and check it out, did not expect crazy ass bitch to pound on him and thus shot him, at the moment i can't see anything that even remotely says "racist" or not self defence? whats up with americans dude they are mentally brainwashed to pulp