Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:37 pm
really can't be arsed to be drawn into the what is wonky/what isn't wonky/is wonky a good name debate. all i came to say was 'EAR DIS: http://www.boomkat.com/item.cfm?id=146939
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
here u go.......incnic wrote:links?
i looked for akira kiteshi the other day but came up with nothing
you not liking thenballers wrote:akira kiteshi are horrendous
your face isballers wrote:akira kiteshi are horrendous
they are a couple of douche's from the burgh..they used to make all this horrendous 80's themed electro / rap music when calvin harris was big..then they started makin music in a similar vain to what we are doin when they saw it was popular..they repeatedly jump on trends.Yes Boss wrote:you not liking thenballers wrote:akira kiteshi are horrendousinto it myself!
its so formulaic and rigid..sounds horrible.Yes Boss wrote:^^^ ahh ok man didn't know that......
the bits I've heard from em "donk" and "tea for shree" I'm proper liking!
In your face, straight up stuff imo......
your kind of missin the point..i wasnt meanin that..i was meanin the music they make sounds formualic and rigid..wasnt a reflection on anyone else..its intentionally "wonky"..euughYes Boss wrote:haha yeah that's the problem with scenes......as soon as a whole sound is
labelled with a name (wonky) there becomes rules/formula of how to make
music that fits into that genre......