Page 4 of 4

Re: dubstep dont need "edits" from djs in other scenes

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 11:03 pm
by seckle
Pistonsbeneath wrote: take the huge amount of toasting samples used to great effect in jungle/garage as well as dubstep to great effect...surely using these lines in totally the wrong context to improve your art and express yourself is worse than doing an edit of something and not change much for ease of use?
jungle evolved and developed years before youtube/myspace/facebook/soundcloud. jungle was spread by pirates, vinyl and mixtape. if you wanted to sample x y or z in those days you had to go to the store, find the sample, take it home, produce it, have it cut and pressed to be heard. you had to make a commitment because the steps were costly. This helped separate the novices from the professionals. now, with this DIY youtube music and rediting trend, its giving power to everyone and their brother harry to show the world that they can't come up with original ideas, or ideas that don't need to be branded and bandwagoned off the back of someone else's ideas. trying to tie in and defend sampling culture, isn't the discussion here. the issue is that people don't give a fuck about integrity.

Re: dubstep dont need "edits" from djs in other scenes

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 12:30 am
by human?
seckle wrote:yeah but human, if i bombed your mural, is that me trying to provoke you or inspire you? or is that me just trying to shine off your shine?

you of all people know graf culture better than anyone. bombing other peoples work, isn't something you do unless you want conflict. besides, i was just using graf as a metaphor for the reality of youtube in this world right now.

graff is complicated lol

RD caught a tag right on the first real piece i ever painted... i was honored, it was weird lol.
seckle wrote:jungle evolved and developed years before youtube/myspace/facebook/soundcloud. jungle was spread by pirates, vinyl and mixtape. if you wanted to sample x y or z in those days you had to go to the store, find the sample, take it home, produce it, have it cut and pressed to be heard. you had to make a commitment because the steps were costly. This helped separate the novices from the professionals. now, with this DIY youtube music and rediting trend, its giving power to everyone and their brother harry to show the world that they can't come up with original ideas, or ideas that don't need to be branded and bandwagoned off the back of someone else's ideas. trying to tie in and defend sampling culture, isn't the discussion here. the issue is that people don't give a fuck about integrity.
i agree with you that integrity is lacking nowadays, and i understand where you are coming from, i just dont think its the edits fault... i think its shitty people sucking like shitty people always do lol...

with the jungle thing, i mean, how many people at first do you think were sampling the metromedia amen brother 45? some im sure, but i think those Ultimate Breaks & Beats compilations were key.... and talk about questionable integrity lol, but yeh, def different times... but hardcore & jungle was actually MORE incestuous, cats used to jack huge chunks of tunes all the time and give zero credit to the original. and put it on vinyl... shit you couldnt get away with nowadays tbh... imean, i dont think anybody can say bukems Atlantis isnt a classic... but its also really just a edit of reel by real's surkit...

but yeh, anybody can make whatever they want now, and not have to learn the ropes or pay dues... but really if that technology wasnt available we wouldnt be talking here now about something called dubstep.

that actually brings up something about edits tho that i think is great.... you learn. how do i structure a song properly? what should it look like mastered? the most common advice ive heard about first learning is take a song you think is dope & sounds good and load it up in your editing prog.

now, if thats alls you do, and put 50 half assed ones on youtube & get signed to universal, im not impressed. lol.

but yeh, im not cynical about peoples intent. i dont think most people are trying to piggyback on somebodies fame. i think MOST edits are done out of respect for the original, and with the desire to integrate the songs into their own sound.

ive personally been playin some edits my bredren has done, a jah war refix & a purple city, cause i played those tunes out hard, but my sound is different now... but its cool to breath new life into the tunes and rock them again in a new style imho.

but yeh, this is really as old as dance music.... the "larry levan 12" dance edit"... the timmy regisford verison, or the latin rascals friday night dance party on wrks kiss fm, straight up tape edits...

from that kode9 tweet, it seems like hes frustrated cause people must send him them shits lol... but sine of the dub & 9 samuri are refixes... and when in nyc he played pon di floor. and despite me really not liking diplo, i respect his strategy, dude is smart, and pon di floor is the perfect example... they got out ahead of the edit game, and gave away their stems. the song became the biggest tune in dance music. and i actually hear the stems being used in all sorts of other songs, in some cool, and other bait ways lol... but yeh, it didnt hurt the original, it actually helped, it involved the fan base, ENGAGED them as active participants in shaping the sound rather than just passive consumers... and i think that is the future.

people lack integrity. they are disrespectful & have no tact. this isnt cause of the edit, its a much bigger society issue. and i dont see the edit as a symptom.. its more like a innocent bystander being used as a shield for wack people.

imho, it really is the same as the sampling argument... shit, its even the same as vinyl vs serato vs cdjs etc.... really its just a issue of, do you suck? and if the answer is yes, then all the tools and edits and samples in the world cant do nothing for you lol..... & meanwhile creative & fun people are getting down in all sorts of interesting ways...

Re: dubstep dont need "edits" from djs in other scenes

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 1:24 am
by Ayatollah
seckle wrote:
wilson wrote:
seckle wrote:yeah but human, if i bombed your mural, is that me trying to provoke you or inspire you? or is that me just trying to shine off your shine?

you of all people know graf culture better than anyone. bombing other peoples work, isn't something you do unless you want conflict. besides, i was just using graf as a metaphor for the reality of youtube in this world right now.
This metaphor does not work.
Your explanation why doesn't work.
human? wrote:
see this argument fails cause when you cross somebody the original piece gets destroyed. when you edit a tune, the original is still there in all its glory.
there you go ;) hth

Re: dubstep dont need "edits" from djs in other scenes

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 12:36 pm
by Pistonsbeneath
seckle wrote:
Pistonsbeneath wrote: take the huge amount of toasting samples used to great effect in jungle/garage as well as dubstep to great effect...surely using these lines in totally the wrong context to improve your art and express yourself is worse than doing an edit of something and not change much for ease of use?
jungle evolved and developed years before youtube/myspace/facebook/soundcloud. jungle was spread by pirates, vinyl and mixtape. if you wanted to sample x y or z in those days you had to go to the store, find the sample, take it home, produce it, have it cut and pressed to be heard. you had to make a commitment because the steps were costly. This helped separate the novices from the professionals. now, with this DIY youtube music and rediting trend, its giving power to everyone and their brother harry to show the world that they can't come up with original ideas, or ideas that don't need to be branded and bandwagoned off the back of someone else's ideas. trying to tie in and defend sampling culture, isn't the discussion here. the issue is that people don't give a fuck about integrity.
i do agree that people lack integrity these days but they always have but just gone about it in different ways...

I of course hate the way youtube has ruined so much music...

Thing is though there is so much out there that in theory only the good stuff should be noticed...beyond that its down to idiots buying into rubbish

Re: dubstep dont need "edits" from djs in other scenes

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 12:51 pm
by syrup
cheeba wrote:Some twats done an "Edit" of joy orbison's wheres the whistle crew. http://soundcloud.com/jurassik/joy-orbi ... -crew-edit

Why do djs/producers from other scenes feel the need to take a perfectly decent tune,lay a real bait drum loop over it and call it a edit WTF???


Someone else played me some terrible mix's of caspa and benga by some tech house dj and just put a 4x4 over it.

:|



and you mean the dubble edits by l-vis1990?

Re: dubstep dont need "edits" from djs in other scenes

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 2:19 pm
by Ayatollah
that dubblestep hype was retarded

Re: dubstep dont need "edits" from djs in other scenes

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 3:38 pm
by Pistonsbeneath


id actually love it if this came out :D

Re: dubstep dont need "edits" from djs in other scenes

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 8:18 pm
by prisoner
^^^^

yah...that's kinda awesome in a weird way.

not into the b-line, but the drums are killer.

Re: dubstep dont need "edits" from djs in other scenes

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 8:21 pm
by egoless
I just read "dubstep don't need..."

and asked myself... Who is dubstep?

:roll:

Re: dubstep dont need "edits" from djs in other scenes

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
by Dark Reign
egoless wrote: and asked myself... Who is dubstep?

:roll:
M.T. Eden