STUDIO - No MIX
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:08 pm
1Love
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:10 pm
goaway
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:59 am
1
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:43 pm
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:56 pm
lolDopeLabs wrote:goaway
AGREED
peace riddim and unity aint no Thugstep round ere
go change your nappy
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:17 pm
personally I think it looks interesting. I'm a fan of the hip hop so it could be aight. I'll dl and see tho.
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:26 pm
it's kinda like mixing the best music in the world with some of the worst music in the world... so it comes out distinctly average in my head. Good effort though.
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:18 pm
Luke Envoy asked you time and again to stop using his tunes without permission..
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:48 am
I haven't d/led these as I dont think I will like them but am I right in thinking these are mash ups?
Hmmm - I think it's a bit dodgy to put an accapella over a well known beat when dubstep is such a niche scene - fair play to people who do 'proper' pirate soul remakes and write their own fresh backing tracks - yam who, blackbeard etc... but surely if your gonna try to invent this 'thugstep' genre - you should at least manage to write your own dubstep backing tracks...
Don't think many of these producers will be happy with you using their beats and taking a joint writers credit on the title!
Maybe it's the US hip hop mixtape versions culture thing not translating well over the water?
Hmmm - I think it's a bit dodgy to put an accapella over a well known beat when dubstep is such a niche scene - fair play to people who do 'proper' pirate soul remakes and write their own fresh backing tracks - yam who, blackbeard etc... but surely if your gonna try to invent this 'thugstep' genre - you should at least manage to write your own dubstep backing tracks...
Don't think many of these producers will be happy with you using their beats and taking a joint writers credit on the title!
Maybe it's the US hip hop mixtape versions culture thing not translating well over the water?
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:24 am
not even mashups. just acapellas over dubstep tunes.
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:32 am
ok im sorry if i offened any1 by postin this up here,
the reason i put these together was to push a genre abit that id neva heard b4, i like the transition.
i can see u guys aint interested
the reason i put these together was to push a genre abit that id neva heard b4, i like the transition.
i can see u guys aint interested
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:46 pm
i wouldnt call it a genre.
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:23 pm
i would....Marsyas wrote:i wouldnt call it a genre.
I think it would fall into the same catergory as "static" and "crying babies"....oh yeh sorry, genre called NOISE...
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:49 pm
Don't get people's beef at all (apart from the permission thing, obviously).
Live and let live, whatever your style is. I'm personally partial to a bit of crunk, so will check this out!
Live and let live, whatever your style is. I'm personally partial to a bit of crunk, so will check this out!
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:19 pm
The reason was there was a lot of drama on here - Nappy vs. pretty much everyone else on the forum in a massive 15 page argument.. wasn't pretty. I assumed you were him actually, posting under an alias. Nothing against you personallytipz wrote:ok im sorry if i offened any1 by postin this up here,
the reason i put these together was to push a genre abit that id neva heard b4, i like the transition.
i can see u guys aint interested
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:31 pm
1) how is the idea of a mashup or blend something that's US and not translating, when the term "mashup" is international? and wouldn't providing an original back track, like the sick remixes XI does, not make these mashups? are you basically saying you don't like the idea of mashups?D-Nile wrote:I haven't d/led these as I dont think I will like them but am I right in thinking these are mash ups?
Hmmm - I think it's a bit dodgy to put an accapella over a well known beat when dubstep is such a niche scene - fair play to people who do 'proper' pirate soul remakes and write their own fresh backing tracks - yam who, blackbeard etc... but surely if your gonna try to invent this 'thugstep' genre - you should at least manage to write your own dubstep backing tracks...
Don't think many of these producers will be happy with you using their beats and taking a joint writers credit on the title!
Maybe it's the US hip hop mixtape versions culture thing not translating well over the water?
2) no one is trying to invent a genre. when nappy did these remixes, he was doing what he's done with hiphop and other genres - he's just making blends.
it must be b/c dubstep is a "niche" genre, as you put it. everyone is so protective of the music... i just don't get it.
in any case, shouts to dj tipz for this one. big up dj cable as well. and, as per usual, big up dj nappy each and every.
sry tipz, although i am in no way shocked that the forum regulars came at you like this.
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:33 pm
That has nothing to do with tipz, and everything to do with the way Nappy conducted himself on here first time round.khal wrote: sry tipz, although i am in no way shocked that the forum regulars came at you like this.
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:39 pm
you say he conducted himself one way, but i saw the progression for what it was, and yourself and the rest of the mods did what you had to do, i guess. no need to get into a round of us disagreeing with each other, esp on that point.UFO over easy wrote:That has nothing to do with tipz, and everything to do with the way Nappy conducted himself on here first time round.khal wrote: sry tipz, although i am in no way shocked that the forum regulars came at you like this.
in any case, big up tipz. proper DJ.
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:43 pm
I'm not a mod
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:46 pm
weird. thought you were for some random reason. oh well.UFO over easy wrote:I'm not a mod